Skip to main content
Download PDF

Transmission sources and severe rat lung worm diseases in travelers: a scoping review

Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines volume 9, Article number: 2 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Rat lung worm disease (RLWD) has several clinical forms including eosinophilic meningitis (EOM) and two severe forms, eosinophilic meningoencephalitis (EOME) and eosinophilic radiculomyelitis (EORM). It remains unclear whether transmission sources are associated with severe forms of RLWD. This study aimed to evaluate if transmission factors are related to the severity of RLWD among travelers by using a scoping review of case reports.

Methods

This was a review using five databases to retrieve case reports and case series of travelers with RLWD. Clinical data and transmission sources of reported cases diagnosed as RLWD were retrieved. The outcome of the study was occurrence of severe forms of RLWD defined as EOME, EORM, and combined EOME/EORM.

Results

We retrieved 1,326 articles from five databases and 31 articles were included in the analysis. There were 84 cases eligible from 15 countries. Four cases were excluded. Seventy cases were in EOM group and 10 cases had EOME or EORM. Compared with the EOM group, the EOME, EORM, and combination EOME/EORM group had similar age, sex, and risk factors of consumptions of apple snails, shrimp and prawn, and salad/vegetables. The EOME group had higher proportion of consumption of African snails than the EOM group (60% vs 13.8%). However, only one study reported the consumption of African snails and the heterogeneity between studies and the small sample size impeded direct comparisons between groups.

Conclusions

RLWD in travelers can be found in most continents and mostly get infected from endemic countries of RLWD. Further studies are required to evaluate the association between transmission vectors and severity of RLWD.

Introduction

Rat lung worm disease (RLWD), caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection, is a global neurological disease. There are three main forms of the RLWD, namely, eosinophilic meningitis (EOM), eosinophilic meningoencephalitis (EOME), and ocular angiostrongyliasis [1, 2]. In addition, there are other forms of RLWD in the literatures, for example, gastrointestinal involvement, eosinophilic radiculomyelitis (EORM), and otoangiostrongyliasis [3,4,5]. These neurological symptoms may be resolved or persistent causing morbidity or mortality [6]. A previous study in Thailand reported that the mortality rate of EOME, a severe form, was as high as 80% [7].

In addition to the people in the endemic areas [8], travelers are another group of persons at risk for RLWD [9]. It may be difficult for physicians to diagnose RLWD if history of traveling and exposure to A. cantonensis larvae is ignored [1, 6, 10, 11]. Humans can get RLWD by consumption of A. cantonensis containing foods including raw freshwater snails, fish, shrimp, or vegetables [12, 13]. Consumption of specific food (transmission sources) may cause severe RLWD. A previous study found that eating raw monitor lizard is associated with EOME in six patients as well as a case of eating raw frogs with wine [14,15,16]. However, there is no previous study on an association between transmission sources and severity of RLWD particularly in travelers. This scoping review aimed to describe transmission sources and severity of RLWD in travelers.

Methods

This was a scoping review by using five databases including PubMed, Scopus, Central database, ProQuest, and CINAHL database [17]. We included a case report or case series of travelers with RLWD. Those articles with an observational design, meta-analysis, or intervention study were excluded. The full search details were in Additional file 1: Appendix. The last search was performed on April 1, 2022. Searching included any articles published since the beginning of the database through April 1, 2022. Hand search was also applied to find additional online articles or data. Eligible articles were included after duplication removal. An initial screening was conducted to include relevant articles. Full text review was performed in those relevant articles; those reports in non-travelers were excluded. The extraction processes were executed by two independent authors (AM and SK). The diagnosis of RLWD was done clinically or by confirmation tests such as ELISA or other serological tests.

Clinical data and risk factors of RLWD were collected. The patients whose clinical data were not available were excluded. The studied variables included baseline characteristics and the risk factors including age, sex, transmission sources for RLWD. The transmission sources defined as raw or uncooked freshwater snails, slugs, shrimp/prawn, frogs, crabs, fish, monitor lizards, vegetables, salad, or water/juice. Study characteristics on time to diagnosis or incubation period, time to treatment, diagnosis of RLWD, confirmation test, treatment, and treatment outcomes were studied. An outbreak investigation was also reported. The outcome of the study was the occurrence of RLWD which was categorized as EOME, EORM and the combination of the two (EOME/EORM). Severe consequences including death and coma were also retrieved. Factors associated with the occurrence of EOME, EORM, and combined EOME/EORM were analyzed and reported using descriptive statistics. The statistical analyses were performed by STATA software version 10.1 (College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

There were 1,326 related articles from five databases and 868 articles for screening as shown in the Prisma flow (Fig. 1). Of those, 834 articles were excluded due to non-relevance. There were 34 articles for full text review with three articles excluded due to non-traveler studies. In total, there were 31 articles included in the review [4, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47] with 84 patients from 15 countries around the world (Table 1). Thailand, USA, and South Korea were the top three countries with 25, 17, and 16 patients respectively. There were eight countries from Europe, two countries from Asia (China and Singapore), one country from Australasia (Australia), and another one country from South America (Brazil). Cases were reported from 1982 until 2019. The mortality rate was 2.38% (2 patients) with severe consequences in 5 patients (5.95%).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A prisma flow chart of reported cases of rat lung worm disease caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in travelers

Full size image
Table 1 Country and numbers of reported cases of rat lung worm disease caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in travelers (n = 84)
Full size table

There were three major outbreaks reported with the highest numbers of patients [23, 27, 47]. The first outbreak was reported from Samoa by Kilks et al. in 1982 [47]. Sixteen out of 24 Korean fishermen (66.7%) who ate raw or uncooked snails developed RLWD: EOM or EORM. Those who ate cooked or did not eat snails did not have the RLWD. Three out of 16 (18.8%) had EOME: one patient died (33.3%).

Another outbreak from Taiwan was reported with 17 Thai patients [23]. The patients consumed raw apple snails from the ponds. All patients diagnosed as EOM and presented with acute headache, but only 11 patients had neck stiffness (64.7%) and 3 patients (17.6%) had pathognomonic hyperesthesia [11]. None of the patients developed severe EOME form. After treatment, all patients had an improvement from headache with minimal sequelae.

The final outbreak from the US reported 12 out of 23 medical students (52.2%) traveled to Jamaica [27]. All patients presented with headache and were diagnosed as EOM: nine patients were admitted (75.0%). Out of 12 patients, neck stiffness and hyperesthesia were found in 10 (83.3%) and 6 (50.0%) patients, respectively. Caesar salad was reported to be associated with the outbreak (p = 0.007). No consumption of snails or slugs was reported by the patients. Headache was improved with one patient reported of fine tremor of the arms and legs.

There three outbreak investigations to assess the possible causes of RLWD by Slom et al. in Chicago, Wang et al. in Taiwan, and Kliks et al. in Hawaii [27, 36, 47]. Slom et al. investigated on 23 travelers returning from Jamaica, twelve of them diagnosed with RLWD (cases) and eleven without infection (controls). The authors used a structured questionnaire on food consumed in Jamaica and linked eating in one specific restaurant and Caesar salad to RLWD (p = 0.001 and 0.007, respectively). Caesar salad contained romaine lettuce from the US and salted anchovies, no snails or mollusks were reported. The authors from Taiwan reported three patients consumed wine with snails from an irrigation canal. The snail meat was either seasoning or roasted for 5–10 min. The authors evaluated if there were any A. cantonensis larva in five irrigations. A. cantonensis larvae were found in snails of all five irrigations with the infected rate of 12.1%, 14.9%, 17.9%, 26.1%, and 29.4%. The larvas were still after 120 min of seasoning or 20 min of roasting. Finally, another study evaluated numbers of snails consumed in the infected patients. The numbers of raw snails eaten by 9 out of 12 patients were reported: ranged from 2 to 5 snails.

Regarding study characteristics on diagnosis and treatment (Table 2), the incubation period was between 1 and 80 days. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) eosinophils ranged between 0 and 73%, while CSF white blood cells were reported from 0 to 2,800 cells/mm3. Note that CSF eosinophilia was not detected in the first lumbar puncture but was presented in the later lumbar puncture [27, 41]. Most studies used serum antibodies against A. cantonensis to 31 kDa antigenic bands, only two studies had recovered A. cantonensis larva in either CSF or pulmonary arteries [22, 23]. Corticosteroid and repeated lumbar puncture was the treatment regimen for severe cases. The clinical outcomes were mostly favorable except those with severe diseases. The recovery time was about 4–8 weeks in average.

Table 2 Study characteristics regarding diagnosis and treatments of rat lung worm disease caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in travelers (n = 84)
Full size table

Among 84 patients, four patients were excluded due to the absence of clinical data in the report. Most patients had EOM (70 patients; 87.50%), while 7 patients had EOME and 4 patients had EORM. Note that one patient had both EOME and EORM (Table 3). Compared with the EOM group, the EOME, EORM, and combination of EOME/EORM group had comparable age, sex, or risk factors of consumptions of apple snails, shrimp and prawn, and salad/vegetables (Table 2). The EOME group had a higher proportion of consumption of African snails than the EOM group (60.00% vs 13.85%) but there were comparable proportions of consumptions of African snails in the EORM and combination of both conditions group versus EOM group (Table 3).

Table 3 Baseline characteristics and risk factors for eosinophilic meningoencephalitis (EOME), eosinophilic radiculomyelitis (EORM), or combination of eosinophilic meningoencephalitis and radiculomyelitis (EOME/EORM) caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in travelers
Full size table

Discussion

RLWD has been reported in travelers worldwide in almost all continents except in Africa. The most common countries of RLWD are Thailand, USA, and South Korea accounted for 69.0% (58/84 cases) as shown in Table 1. Not only reported from other countries, Thailand is the most endemic are for RLWD [48]. There were 1337 reported cases out of 2827 cases worldwide (47.3%), while French Polynesia and USA were ranked as the third and fourth endemic countries resulting in several reported cases in travelers infected from and to these two countries (Table 1). There is no reported case from Africa may be due to limited travel in this continent as well as no reported cases previously. Note that study characteristics in travelers were comparable with previously reported. The maximum incubation period was slightly shorter than the studies in Thailand which had incubation at the most of 3 months [10,11,12]. CSF eosinophils, a diagnostic indicator, may be found in the later lumbar punctures as well as the convalescent serum antibodies against the A. cantonensis antigenic bands.

This study revealed that people infected RLWD by African giant snails had higher rate of EOME than the EOM group. Despite consumption of less than 10 African snails per patient, three of 12 Korean fishermen (25%) developed severe EOME [47]. However, only one study reported the consumption of African snails and the heterogeneity between studies and the small sample size impeded direct comparisons between groups. (Table 2). Patients with RLWD in Thailand usually have a history of eating raw freshwater snails such as Pila snails with quite a few number of snails [49, 50]. Additionally, very few cases of severe or EOME were reported in Thailand. A review of 527 patients with EOM found that none of them had severe RLWD or EOME [49], while reports from outside Thailand had more severe consequences such as EOME associated with African snails [51,52,53]. Compared with other transmission sources, African giant snails accounted for 17.4% of all sources (12 out of 69 cases) as shown in Table 2. Note that only one case series reported on consumption of African giant snails in this review [47].

Presence of EORM is another factor for severe disease [47]. For EORM and combination of EOME/EORM outcomes, there is no significant factor associated with these outcomes. These findings may be due to small number of patients in EORM category (Table 2). The causative agent A. cantonensis is a neurotropic nematode but they usually migrate to meninges in humans. Random migration to spinal cord may cause severe disease as shown by one fatal case with the evidence of A. cantonensis larva in the lumbar spinal cord but not in the meninges or brain [47]. However, the number is too small to determine an association.

There are some limitations in this study. The design is a retrospective review of the database. Therefore, it may be some missing data shown in Table 2. Causal relationship may not be demonstrated. No correlation or meta-analysis was performed. Finally, in the EORM group had small sample size. Further larger studies are required.

Conclusions

RLWD in travelers can be found in most continents and mostly get infected from endemic countries of RLWD. Further studies are required to demonstrate the association between transmission vectors and severity of RLWD.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available upon request.

References

  1. Sawanyawisuth K, Sawanyawisuth K. Treatment of angiostrongyliasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:990–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sawanyawisuth K, Takahashi K, Hoshuyama T, Sawanyawisuth K, Senthong V, Limpawattana P, et al. Clinical factors predictive of encephalitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:698–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sawanyawisuth K, Pugkhem A, Mitchai J, Intapan PM, Anunnatsiri S, Limpawattana P, et al. Abdominal angiostrongyliasis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis: a possible cause of eosinophilic infiltration in human digestive tract. Pathol Res Pract. 2010;206:102–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maretić T, Perović M, Vince A, Lukas D, Dekumyoy P, Begovac J. Meningitis and radiculomyelitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:996–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chotmongkol V, Yimtae K, Intapan PM. Angiostrongylus eosinophilic meningitis associated with sensorineural hearing loss. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118:57–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sawanyawisuth K, Sawanyawisuth K, Senthong V, Limpawattana P, Intapan PM, Tiamkao S, et al. Peripheral eosinophilia as an indicator of meningitic angiostrongyliasis in exposed individuals. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2010;105:942–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chotmongkol V, Sawanyawisuth K. Clinical manifestations and outcome of patients with severe eosinophilic meningoencephalitis presumably caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2002;33:231–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khamsai S, Chindaprasirt J, Chotmongkol V, Tiamkao S, Limpawattana P, Senthong V, et al. Clinical features of eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Thailand: a systematic review: Clinical EOM. Asia Pac J Sci Technol. 2020;25:APST-25-02-09. Available from: https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/APST/article/view/240510. Cited 2022 Apr 20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ansdell V, Wattanagoon Y. Angiostrongylus cantonensis in travelers: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018;31:399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sawanyawisuth K, Sawanyawisuth K, Senthong V, Limpawattana P, Phichaphop A, Intapan PM, et al. How can clinicians ensure the diagnosis of meningitic angiostrongyliasis? Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:73–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sawanyawisuth K, Chotmongkol V. Eosinophilic meningitis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;114:207–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sawanyawisuth K, Sawanyawisuth K, Senthong V, Limpawattana P, Intapan PM, Maleewong W, et al. Clinical features and course of Angiostrongylus cantonensis eosinophilic meningitis in patients receiving supportive therapy. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2020;21:e00095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jarvi SI, Eamsobhana P, Quarta S, Howe K, Jacquier S, Hanlon A, et al. Estimating human exposure to rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) on Hawai’i Island: a pilot study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;102:69–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanpittaya J, Jitpimolmard S, Tiamkao S, Mairiang E. MR findings of eosinophilic meningoencephalitis attributed to Angiostrongylus cantonensis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1090–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsai H-C, Lai P-H, Sy C-L, Lee SS-J, Yen C-M, Wann S-R, et al. Encephalitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis after eating raw frogs mixed with wine as a health supplement. Intern Med. 2011;50:771–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Panackel C, Vishad, Cherian G, Vijayakumar K, Sharma RN. Eosinophilic meningitis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006;24:220–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Namwaing P, Ngamjarus C, Sakaew W, Sawunyavisuth B, Sawanyawisuth K, Khamsai S, et al. Chest physical therapy and outcomes in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a systematic review. J Med Assoc Thai. 2021;104:S165–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fischer PR. Eosinophilic meningitis. West J Med. 1983;139:372–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scemama M, Chiron C, Georges P, Dulac O. [Radiculomyeloencephalitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in children]. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1988;45:417–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vuadens P, Regli F. Eosinophil meningoradiculitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1995;151:354–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thobois S, Broussolle E, Aimard G, Chazot G. Ingestion of raw fish: a cause of eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis after a trip to Tahiti. Presse Med. 1996;25:508.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cooke-Yarborough CM, Kornberg AJ, Hogg GG, Spratt DM, Forsyth JR. A fatal case of angiostrongyliasis in an 11-month-old infant. Med J Aust. 1999;170:541–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai HC, Liu YC, Kunin CM, Lee SS, Chen YS, Lin HH, et al. Eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis: report of 17 cases. Am J Med. 2001;111:109–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tseng Y-T, Tsai H-C, Sy CL, Lee SS-J, Wann S-R, Wang Y-H, et al. Clinical manifestations of eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis: 18 years’ experience in a medical center in southern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011;44:382–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lo Re V, Gluckman SJ. Eosinophilic meningitis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis in a returned traveler: case report and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:e112-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. de Roux-Serratrice C, Allègre T, Bensaïd T, Bigorgne C, Vassal D, Caillères S. Eosinophilic meningitis on returning from Tahiti. Presse Med. 2002;31:1219.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Slom TJ, Cortese MM, Gerber SI, Jones RC, Holtz TH, Lopez AS, et al. An outbreak of eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in travelers returning from the Caribbean. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:668–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bärtschi E, Bordmann G, Blum J, Rothen M. Eosinophilic meningitis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Switzerland. Infection. 2004;32:116–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Batmanian JJ, O’Neill JH. Eosinophilic meningoencephalitis with permanent neurological sequelae. Intern Med J. 2004;34:217–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Podwall D, Gupta R, Furuya EY, Sevigny J, Resor SR. Angiostrongylus cantonensis meningitis presenting with facial nerve palsy. J Neurol. 2004;251:1280–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rau C, Bialek R, Richter S, Lindner A. [Headache after a stay in the Dominican Republic]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006;131:1656–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones MS, Mohanraj R, Shaunak S. Eosinophillic meningitis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis: first reported case in the UK. ACNR. 2007;6:20–1. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Eosinophillic-Meningitis-due-to-Angiostrongylus-in-Jones-Mohanraj/588d56baa5b1246ff05e4c14d90876240272408d. Cited 2022 Apr 19.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Leone S, De Marco M, Ghirga P, Nicastri E, Esposito M, Narciso P. Eosinophilic meningitis in a returned traveler from Santo Domingo: case report and review. J Travel Med. 2007;14:407–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ali AB, Van den Enden E, Van Gompel A, Van Esbroeck M. Eosinophilic meningitis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis in a Belgian traveller. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2008;6:41–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Malvy D, Ezzedine K, Receveur M-C, Pistone T, Crevon L, Lemardeley P, et al. Cluster of eosinophilic meningitis attributable to Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection in French policemen troop returning from the Pacific Islands. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2008;6:301–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang J-J, Chung L-Y, Lin R-J, Lee J-D, Lin C-W, Yen C-M. Eosinophilic meningitis risk associated with raw Ampullarium canaliculatus snails consumption. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2011;27:184–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lammers AJJ, Goorhuis A, van de Beek D, Grobusch MP, Bart A, van Gool T, et al. Eosinophilia à deux: a brain nagging souvenir from the Philippines. Infection. 2015;43:615–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Prasidthrathsint K, Lewis J, Couturier MR. The brief case: Angiostrongylus cantonensis eosinophilic meningitis in a returned traveler. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:2880–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Meyer C, Wynn DP, Pulst SM, Chen R, Digre K. Clinical reasoning: a 22-year-old man with diplopia. Neurology. 2017;89:e45–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Luessi F, Sollors J, Torzewski M, Müller HD, Siegel E, Blum J, et al. Eosinophilic meningitis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Germany. J Travel Med. 2009;16:292–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ramirez-Avila L, Slome S, Schuster FL, Gavali S, Schantz PM, Sejvar J, et al. Eosinophilic meningitis due to Angiostrongylus and Gnathostoma species. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:322–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lim JM, Lee CC, Wilder-Smith A. Eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis: a case report and literature review. J Travel Med. 2004;11:388–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Clouston PD, Corbett AJ, Pryor DS, Garrick R. Eosinophilic meningitis: cause of a chronic pain syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53:778–81. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1014256/. Cited 2022 Apr 19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Brummaier T, Bertschy S, Arn K, Treumann T, Ruf M-T, Nickel B, et al. A blind passenger: a rare case of documented seroconversion in an Angiostrongylus cantonensis induced eosinophilic meningitis in a traveler visiting friends and relatives. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2019;5:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Guan H, Hoi C, Cui L, Chen L. Eosinophilic meningitis caused by infection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in a traveler. Chin J Contemp Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;13:55–7. Available from: http://manu21.magtech.com.cn/cjcnn/CN/abstract/abstract459.shtml. Cited 2022 Apr 19.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Berger S. Infectious Diseases of Taiwan eBook. GIDEON; 2021. Available from: https://www.gideononline.com/ebooks/infectious-diseases-of-taiwan/. Cited 2022 Apr 20.

  47. Kliks MM, Kroenke K, Hardman JM. Eosinophilic radiculomyeloencephalitis: an angiostrongyliasis outbreak in American Samoa related to ingestion of Achatina fulica snails. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1982;31:1114–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang Q-P, Lai D-H, Zhu X-Q, Chen X-G, Lun Z-R. Human angiostrongyliasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:621–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Khamsai S, Chindaprasirt J, Chotmongkol V, Tiamkao S, Limpawattana P, Senthong V, et al. Clinical features of eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Thailand: a systematic review. Asia-Pac J Sci Technol. 2020;25:APST-25-02-09 6 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Eamsobhana P, Yoolek A, Yong H-S. Effect of Thai “koi-hoi” food flavoring on the viability and infectivity of the third-stage larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Angiostrongylidae). Acta Trop. 2010;113:245–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kwon E, Ferguson TM, Park SY, Manuzak A, Qvarnstrom Y, Morgan S, et al. A severe case of Angiostrongylus eosinophilic meningitis with encephalitis and neurologic sequelae in Hawa’i. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013;72:41–5.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hwang KP, Chen ER, Chen TS. [Eosinophilic meningitis and meningoencephalitis in children]. Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi. 1994;35:124–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hwang KP, Chen ER. Clinical studies on angiostrongyliasis cantonensis among children in Taiwan. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1991;22(Suppl):194–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Prof. Yukifumi Nawa for editing the final manuscript via Publication Clinic KKU, Thailand (PCO-879).

Funding

This study was supported by Distinguished Research Professor Grant, Thailand Research Fund (Grant no. DPG6280002) to Wanchai Maleewong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, 123 Mitraparp Road, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 40002

    Atibordee Meesing, Sittichai Khamsai, Kittisak Sawanyawisuth, Somsak Tiamkao, Panita Limpawattana & Watchara Boonsawat

  2. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 40002

    Wanchai Maleewong

  3. Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 40002

    Bundit Sawunyavisuth

  4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand, 40002

    Chetta Ngamjarus

Authors
  1. Atibordee Meesing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sittichai Khamsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kittisak Sawanyawisuth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Somsak Tiamkao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wanchai Maleewong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Panita Limpawattana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bundit Sawunyavisuth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chetta Ngamjarus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Watchara Boonsawat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors were involved in study design. AM, SK, and KS were responsible for data collection. CN performed literature search. AM, SK, KS, BS and CN were involved in data analysis and interpretation. AM and SK wrote the manuscript. ST, WM, PL, and WB provided technical guidance and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sittichai Khamsai or Kittisak Sawanyawisuth.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Appendix.

Searching strategies of reported cases of rat lung worm disease caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis in travelers in five databases.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meesing, A., Khamsai, S., Sawanyawisuth, K. et al. Transmission sources and severe rat lung worm diseases in travelers: a scoping review. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines 9, 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-022-00184-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-022-00184-4

Keywords

Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines

ISSN: 2055-0936

Contact us