Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines

Open Access

Epidemiology of tunga penetrans infestation in selected areas in Kiharu constituency, Murang’a County, Kenya

  • Jamleck N. Mwangi1Email author,
  • Hastings S. Ozwara2 and
  • Michael M. Gicheru1
Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines20151:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-015-0015-4

Received: 17 June 2015

Accepted: 20 November 2015

Published: 5 December 2015

Abstract

Background

Tungiasis is a parasitic skin disease brought about by female Tunga penetrans when they burrow into the skin of their hosts. It is a disease that has largely been ignored. Epidemiology of tungiasis has not been widely studied in Kenya which could negatively affect effective intervention strategies. This study therefore sought to investigate epidemiology of tungiasis in selected areas in Kiharu constituency, Murang’a County in Kenya.

Methods

The study population comprised of public primary school pupils, the most vulnerable age group (n = 508) in Gaturi, Kimathi, Kahuhia and Mugoiri in Kiharu constituency. Public primary school pupils in the study area were randomly sampled. Through questionnaires and observations, data was collected.

Results

The overall prevalence of tungiasis in pupils in the study area was 19.1 %. In multinomial logistic regression analysis some factors were identified to be associated with tungiasis such as lack of regular use of closed foot ware (Adjusted odds ratio = 10.45; 95 % Confidence Interval; 1.49–73.23), living in earthen mud walled houses (aOR = 13.78; 95 % CI = 3.127–60.69), sharing living quarters with domestic animals (aOR = 3.1; 95 % CI = 0.003–.046) and learning in classrooms with dusty floors (aOR = 14.657; 95 % CI = 2.262–94.95). Treatment of tungiasis was found to be mainly through mechanical removal of embedded T. penetrans.

Conclusion

This study shows that tungiasis in the selected study areas of Kiharu constituency is a disease of significant health concern. Factors associated with tungiasis were identified that should be the focus of sustainable and effective control measures.

Keywords

EpidemiologyTungiasisFactors associated with tungiasis

Background

Tungiasis is a parasitic skin disease caused by female T. penetrans [1]. Signs associated with the disease include severe local itching, pain and sensation of a foreign body in the skin [2]. Most lesions occur on the nail rim, periungual area of the toes, the heels, the soles and other parts of the body such as hands, elbows, neck, buttocks and the genital region [1, 35]. Severe lesions do occur and are usually located in clusters [6]. Moreover, heavy infestation with hundred of embedded T. penetrans often occur in severe tungiasis [6]. Diagnosis involves identification of the parasite especially through mechanical removal using a sharp pointed object such as a needle. Furthermore, patient’s travelling history is also quite important.

Tungiasis is endemic in many countries in Latin America, the Caribbean and sub-Sahara Africa [2]. In Kenya, it is a neglected serious health problem to the extent that epidemiological data is scarce [3]. It has led to severe morbidity to its victims especially in economically challenged rural communities [7]. More over tungiasis is incapacitating especially due to severe physical disability emanating from its pathological effects especially on limbs. This often contributes to the characteristic high poverty levels to it victims. In Nigeria, a third of people with tungiasis have difficulties in walking [8]. Tungiasis high transmission rate is due to some factors such as poor housing conditions, social neglect and inadequate health care [2]. In Erekit, a rural community in Lagos, Nigeria, earthen houses, presence of loitering pigs, resting in a common place near the house, and lack of regular use of closed foot ware are important factors for tungiasis [8]. In a fishing rural community North East Brazil, intensity of infestation in infested pets was found to positively correlate to intensity of infestation among the members of the community [9].

As of 2009, estimated 1.6 million Kenyans were suffering from tungiasis and 10 million others were at risk [10]. In 2010, the prevalence of tungiasis in Murang’a south, an endemic area, was suggested to be 57 % in children of 5–12 years [11]. Unhygienic conditions have been identified as the major causes of tungiasis in Kenya [12]. In addition, soil factors such as organic matter content, moisture, pH, color and texture have been suggested to influence prevalence of tungiasis by up to 33 % [13]. Soil factors were also found to influence T. penetrans population by up to 39.7 % [13]. Though such information is already available, more work on epidemiology especially in vulnerable age groups such as children and the aged in other endemic regions in Kenya need to be pursued. In fact, the prevalence rates in different Counties in Kenya are not very clear [3]. Murang’a is one of the Counties suggested to have high prevalence of tungiasis [3].

Methods

Study population, study area and study design

This study was carried out in 2012 and 2013 when the public primary schools were in session, during dry weather seasons. This is because rainy seasons made some places inaccessible due to poor road network. Before the onset of the study, information meetings were held with teachers, parents, pupils and community members. Areas recruited for this study are Gaturi, Kimathi, Kahuhia and Mugoiri in Kiharu constituency that has a total of 21 public primary schools. Their accessibility was important while reports of tungiasis in primary schools from local health officers were useful during survey. All 21 schools (Gaturi 5, Mugoiri 8, Kimathi 4 and Kahuhia 4 schools) with a total population of 3500 pupils were approached and sampled. Five hundred and eight pupils participated in the study. Simple random sampling was used to recruit pupils for the study using a random number table. Observations and pilot tested questionnaires were used to collect data at school. Pupil’s homes were visited to take home data.

Diagnosis of tungiasis was done by a clinical officer. All participants were thoroughly examined for the presence of embedded T. penetrans. Clinical examination was carefully performed by inspecting feet, legs, hands and arms for lesions in various stages of Fortaleza classification. To uphold individual privacy, other parts of the body not normally exposed were not examined [14]. For the purpose of clinical examination the following was considered diagnostic for tungiasis: an itchy spot that is either red to white-brown in color, a lesion that is circular with a black dot at the center, at times with strings of white tiny eggs oozing out. Other diagnostic findings were a crust that is black with necrotic tissues, including totally or partially removed fleas, hence a characteristic sore skin. Localization and number of lesions were recorded and categorized as mild (<5 lesions), moderate (6 to 30 lesions) and heavy infestation (>30 lesions) [15].

Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria

Pupils sampled in the study population, both infested and non-infested by T. penetrans were included in the study. However pupils who reserved their consent were excluded.

Ethical approval and consent

Written research ethical clearance was obtained from Murang’a general hospital ethical committee and Institute of Primate Research (IPR). Written permits to visit schools were obtained from Education Officers in the study area. Before the study, the objectives and the study protocol were explained to the teachers and pupils in meetings who then approved the study. Written consent by the head teachers was given. Each study subject also gave written consent at individual level.

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS version 20 was used to analyze the data. Binary logistic regression analysis of the variables was first performed to determine variables for analysis in a multinomial logistic analysis. Variables whose p value was less than 0.05 in the binary analysis were adjusted for confounding in a multinomial logistic analysis. Their adjusted odds ratios were calculated to determine their independent association with tungiasis. Colinearity of the variables was assessed using regression diagnostics. Variables analyzed using multinomial logistic regression showed no collinearity. Statistical significance was considered when value of p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Data was collected from 508 pupils that participated in the study. Boys were 259 (50.98 %) and girls were 249 (49.01 %). Tunga penetrans lesions were mainly found on feet (Figs. 1 and 2). Pupils infested with T. penetrans were 97, a prevalence of 19.1 %. The prevalence of tungiasis in pupils in Mugoiri was 23.3 % (45/193), 21.6 % (21/97) in Kahuhia, 17.5 % (17/97) in Kimathi and 11.5 % (14/121) in Gaturi. A total of 52 boys were infested, a prevalence of 20.1 % while 45 girls were infested which was a prevalence of 18.1 %. Pupils with mild infestation were 26 (5.1 %), moderately infested were 48 (9.4 %) and those heavily infested were 23 (4.5 %). The intensities of infestation related to pupil’s age are shown in Fig. 3. The prevalence of tungiasis in pupils in relation to their age brackets was observed to have a unique trend that assumed a sigmoid curve. This is because pupils of 4–6 years had a prevalence of 12.5 %, while those of 7–9 years had a prevalence of 18.3 %. The peak was in children of 10–12 years whose prevalence was 21.5 %. This prevalence then decreased so that children between 13–15 years had a prevalence of 16.5 % and those of 16–18 years had a prevalence of 8.3 %.
Fig. 1

Lesions of T. penetrans on the right heel of a grade 6 boy

Fig. 2

Lesions of T. penetrans in the peringual region of the left foot of a grade 4 girl

Fig. 3

Prevalence of T. penetrans infestation stratified by different age brackets and severity of tungiasis

The odds ratios of factors identified to influence tungiasis in a binary logistic analysis are shown in Table 1. In a multinomial logistic regression (Table 2), factors independently associated with tungiasis were identified as; type of housing material (adjusted odds ratio = 13.78; 95 % Confidence Interval = 3.127–60.69), Sharing living quarters with domestic animals (aOR = 3.1; 95 % CI = 0.003–0.046), lack of closed foot wears (aOR = 10.45; 95 % CI = 1.49–73.23) and status of classroom floors (aOR = 14.657; 95 % CI = 2.262–94.95).
Table 1

Binary logistic regression analysis of factors associated with tungiasis

Factor

No. examined (n)

Infested (%)

Odds ratio (95 % CI)

p value

Gender

Girls

249

45 (18.07)

Reference

 

Boys

259

52 (20.07)

0.622 (0.158–2.45)

0.498

Housing wall material

Wood

179

4 (2.23)

0.009 (0.01–0.077)

0.000

Iron sheet

188

17 (9.04)

0.063 (0.013–0.303)

0.001

Mud/mud bricks

141

76 (53.9)

Reference

 

Sharing living quarters with domestic animals

Share

96

80 (83.3)

123.63 (22.68–673.95)

0.000

Do not share

412

17 (4.1)

Reference

 

Status of classroom floor

Cemented and clean

399

11 (2.7)

0.002 (0.000–0.015)

0.000

Not cemented

26

14 (53.8)

0.062 (0.008–0.460)

0.007

Cemented and dusty

83

72 (86.7)

Reference

 

Footwear

With shoes

77

6 (7.79)

0.081 (0.010–0.661)

0.019

Without shoes

431

91 (21.1)

Reference

 

Knowledge

(a) Probable cause of tungiasis

From soil

158

27 (17.1)

0.640 (0.072–5.713)

0.690

From Domestic animals

269

52 (19.3)

1.095 (0.153–7.854)

0.928

From infested people

81

18 (22.2)

Reference

 

(b) Treatment employed

Do not treat

14

6 (42.8)

0.142 (0.001–18.177)

0.430

Using herbs

48

7 (14.58)

0.147 (0.004–5.810)

0.307

Removing them

415

76 (18.31)

0.448 (0.023–8.781)

0.597

Removing and use of herbs

31

8 (25.8)

Reference

 
Table 2

Multinomial logistic regression analysis of factors associated with tungiasis

Factor

Adjusted OR (95 % CI)

P value

Conditions of classroom floor

14.656 (2.262–94.951)

0.005

Housing materials

13.775 (3.127–60.685)

0.001

Sharing living quarters with domestic animals

3.1 (0.003–0.046)

0.000

Use of closed foot ware

10.448 (1.491–73.228)

0.018

Discussions

Most pupils preferred treatment of tungiasis by immediate mechanical removal of embedded fleas using sharp pointed objects. This destroys the flea before it lays eggs, break the life cycle and also prevent secondary infections. However there is danger of sharing contaminated sharp objects among pupils that can spread blood related diseases such as HIV and hepatitis. In view of this observation, exploring other effective ways of treating tungiasis without actual mechanical removal, such as washing with disinfectant, topographic application of anti-parasitic agents, use of anti-inflammatory creams and use of repellants should be preferred.

Domestic animals in the home such as cats, dogs, chicken and goats is an important factor associated with tungiasis, perhaps because they harbor the T. penetrans fleas. Moreover sharing house with such animals aggravates tungiasis. Similarly, the importance of such domestic animals has been described in a study done in traditional fishing community North East Brazil [9]. The study revealed that occupants of households with infested pets and domestic animals had tungiasis that correlated to infestation in the animals [9]. The fleas take blood meal from the warm blooded organism and sometimes female T. penetrans cause tungiasis in them [7]. Therefore to combat tungiasis in the study areas, separate housing of domestic animals such as goats, chicken, dogs and cats is important. Regularly dusting these animals with insecticides such as sevin dust is crucial to reduce the flea burden.

Poor housing was associated with tungiasis probably because earthen houses are dusty and have cracks on the walls and floors providing good breeding environment for T. penetrans. Maintaining high levels of cleanliness in such houses is also quite challenging. This could increase the flea population hence high attack rate. Similar observations were made in a recent study in Murang’a South [11] that demonstrated that the highest chance of infestation exists in individuals living in houses with earthen floors. To decrease transmission of T. penetrans among humans, concrete floors should be preferred as opposed to earthen ones. Indeed, in shacks with concrete floors being cleaned every day with water, T. penetrans larvae were hardly found [16]. However economically disadvantaged victims, unless supported are not able to improve their housing from the current state. For this reason, we find it important to engage the affected in income generating activities through organized social grouping such as women and youth groups to help combat tungiasis in the study area. This would raise their living standards and afford better housing facilities.

Dusty classrooms including those that are not cemented significantly influence tungiasis in school going children. This is probably because they offer good breeding places. This finding is consistent to a report on tungiasis situation in rural schools in Busia and Teso Districts, Kenya [3] whereby classrooms which are often dusty were identified as points of infestation, which was aggravated by earthen floor. Therefore to reduce tungiasis in such classrooms, daily cleaning of cemented floors with water could be helpful. Sprinkling water on floors that are not cemented, accompanied by sweeping on daily basis would be equally important. Funding of water projects in such schools as well as improving classroom infrastructural standards should utilize Community Development Fund (CDF). This would minimize economic challenges to accessing clean environment.

Regular use of closed footwear could be protective against tungiasis. Generally shoes could prevent infestation and re-infestation of feet by fleas from the ground or from one person to another. This finding is upheld by an earlier study that demonstrated that lack of regular use of proper footwear is an important factor for tungiasis in Erikit, Brazil [8]. Muehlen et al. [15] made similar observation when in his studies on tungiasis concluded that factors such as age, type of housing, level of education, lack of shoes and low socio-economic profile predispose individuals to tungiasis. Shoes however only protect the feet as compared to other parts of the body such as knees or fingers. Furthermore, though shoes are protective to the feet and they do not actually eradicate the fleas. Maintenance of the shoe general hygiene and that of socks to remove and destroys adhered eggs or larvae is quite important. Nevertheless, provision of shoes by County government and NGOs such as Ahadi Kenya Trust would prevent spread of tungiasis to a great extent in pupils in the study areas of Kiharu constituency.

From these observations, there is a strong conviction that improved living standards of the affected communities could reduce tungiasis by a big margin. Intervention by engaging the affected communities in income generating economic activities would help address the economic factors and perhaps tungiasis could be no more.

Kiharu Constituency Strategic Development Plan (2010–2030) [17] acknowledges that tungiasis contribute to school dropout. However it fails to give its prevalence among the other diseases most prevalent in the constituency. A list of most prevalent diseases in the constituency identified in the plan are; malaria 42.4 %, typhoid 14.1 %, flue and cold 12.1 %, Diabetes 8.7 %, pneumonia 6.5 %, STDs & AIDS 5.4 %, tuberculosis 4.2 %, hypertension 2.0 %, stroke 2.0 %, Arthritis 1.7 %, Worm infections 0.6 %, and meningitis 0.3 %. The prevalence of tungiasis is interestingly missing altogether. This is an indication that tungiasis is simply neglected. Heukelbach et al. [18] supports this finding when he pointed out that tungiasis is indeed neglected being considered as just an entomological nuisance. This make it fall sort of attention by researchers and health professionals.

The high prevalence of tungiasis in pupils of 10 to 12 years was probably due to more exposure to associated factors. Most of children at this age are barefooted, playful and may have challenges maintaining cleanliness as well as removing embedded T. penetrans. In fact boys of this age spend most of their free time with pets like dogs that could be harboring T. penetrans [3]. This perhaps explains their higher prevalence compared to girls, showing preponderance of infestation in the male sex. This finding corresponds to the findings of Community-based studies that have consistently shown preponderance of infestation in the male sex [19, 20]. This trend in prevalence of tungiasis among the age brackets is consistent with observations of another study that demonstrated that a relationship between tungiasis and age brackets exist [8].

This study recommends development and sustenance of public health awareness campaigns to reduce tungiasis. In schools, health clubs or equivalent would be very useful. Strategies against tungiasis aimed at reducing stigma and improving hygiene are important. This study further discourages people from sharing living quarters with domestic animals to reduce chances of infestation. Regular dusting of infested domestic animals with insecticides would reduce the flea burden in such animals. Strategies to engage affected communities in diversified economic activities through organized women and youth groups are highly recommended. This would help address economic factors associated with tungiasis.

Conclusions

This study concludes that tungiasis is an important health issue in pupils in the selected areas of study in Kiharu constituency that should not be ignored. Intervention strategies addressing the factors associated with the disease should be emphasized to reduce the disease burden. Approaches taken should be holistic involving all community members.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

In support of this study were institutions namely; National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI), Kenyatta University, Institute of Primate Research (IPR), Murang’a County Hospital and other health centers in Kiharu constituency. We appreciate co-operation by Public Health Officers (PHO) in the study area and especially Community Health Workers (CHW) for their support during the field work. The study subjects; pupils, parents and guardians are highly appreciated.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Zoological sciences, Kenyatta University
(2)
Department of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, Institute of Primate Research, National Museums of Kenya

References

  1. Feldmeier H, Sentongo E, Krantz I. Tungiasis (sand flea disease): A parasitic disease with particular challenges for public health. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32 Suppl 1:19–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Heukelbach J, Oliveiras F, Hesse G, Feldmeier H. Tungiasis: a neglected health problem of poor communities. Trop Med Int Health. 2001;6:267–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahadi Kenya Trust. The jigger menace in Kenya. Anti-Jigger Magazine. 2008 http://www.jigger-ahadi.org/Anti%20Jigger%20magazine%20Final.pdf
  4. Heukelbach J, Feldmeier H. Tungiasis in poor communities of Northeast Brazil: an important public health problem. Public Health. 2002;16:79–87.Google Scholar
  5. Veraldi S, Valsecchi M. Imported tungiasis: A report of 19 cases and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol. 2007;46(10):1061–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ariza L, Wilcke T, Jackson A, Gomide M, Ugbomoiko US, Feldmeier H, et al. A simple method for rapid community assessment of tungiasis. Trop Med Int Health. 2010;15(7):856–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisele M, Heukelbach J, Van Marck E, Mehlhorn H, Meckes O, Franck S. Investigations on the biology, epidemiology, pathology and control of Tunga penetrans in Brazil: Natural History of Tungiasis in man. Parasitol Res. 2003;90:87–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ugbomoiko US, Ariza L, Ofoezie IE, Heukelbach J. Risk Factors for Tungiasis in Nigeria: Identification of Targets for Effective Intervention. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007;1(3):e87. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000087.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pilger D, Schwalfenberg S, Heukelbach J, Witt L, Mehlhorn H, Mencke N. Investigations on the biology, epidemiology, pathology, and control of Tunga penetrans in Brazil: VII. The importance of animal reservoirs for human infestation. Parasitol Res. 2008;102(5):875–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation. Kenya National Assembly Official Record (Hansard). The parliamentary ministerial statement on tungiasis in Kenya. 2009. https://books.google.co.ke/books.
  11. Ngomi NN. Tungiasis in 5-12 year olds and associated factors in Murang’a South district. http://elearning.jkuat.ac.ke/journals/ojs/index.php/pgthesis_abs/article/view/224/190. Accessed 27 March 2010.
  12. Ruttoh SK, Omondi DO, Wanyama NI. Tunga penetrans―A Silent Setback to Development in Kenya. 2012. http://www.davidpublishing.com/davidpublishing/Upfile/6/4/2012/2012060401453585.pdf
  13. Ngunjiri J, Keiyoro P. Investigation of soil factors influencing the prevalence of the Tunga penetrans (Jigger flea) in Muranga county- Kenya. 2012. http://www.amazon.it/factors-influencing-occurrence-Tunga-penetrans/dp/384650095X
  14. Heukelbach J, Wilcke T, Eisele M, Feldmeier H. Ectopic localization of tungiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2002;67:214–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Muehlen M, Feldmeier H, Wilcke T, Winter B, Heukelbach J. Identifying risk factors for tungiasis and heavy infestation in a resource-poor community in Northeast Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006;100:371–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nagy N, Abari E, D’Haese J, Calheiros C, Heukelbach J, Mencke N, et al. Investigations on the life cycle and morphology of Tunga penetrans in Brazil. Parasitol Res. 2007;101:233–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ndegwa E. Kiharu Constituency Strategic Development Plan 2010–2030. 2013: http://urbanplanning.uonbi.ac.ke/node/970
  18. Heukelbach J, Costa L, Wilcke T, Mencke N, Feldmeier H. The animal reservoir of Tunga penetrans in poor communities in Northeast Brazil. Med Vet Entomol. 2003;17:76–81.Google Scholar
  19. Wilcke T, Heukelbach J, Cesar MR, Regina SK, Feldmeier H. High prevalence of tungiasis in a poor neighbourhood in Fortaleza, Northeast Brazil. Acta Trop. 2002;83:255–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Muehlen M, Heukelbach J, Wilcke T. Investigations on the Biology, epidemiology, pathology and control of Tunga penetrans in Brazil; Prevalence, parasite load and topographic distribution of lesions in the population of a traditional fishing village. Parasitol Res. 2003;90:449–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mwangi et al. 2015

Advertisement