Skip to main content

Table 1 Binary logistic regression analysis of factors associated with tungiasis

From: Epidemiology of tunga penetrans infestation in selected areas in Kiharu constituency, Murang’a County, Kenya

Factor

No. examined (n)

Infested (%)

Odds ratio (95 % CI)

p value

Gender

Girls

249

45 (18.07)

Reference

 

Boys

259

52 (20.07)

0.622 (0.158–2.45)

0.498

Housing wall material

Wood

179

4 (2.23)

0.009 (0.01–0.077)

0.000

Iron sheet

188

17 (9.04)

0.063 (0.013–0.303)

0.001

Mud/mud bricks

141

76 (53.9)

Reference

 

Sharing living quarters with domestic animals

Share

96

80 (83.3)

123.63 (22.68–673.95)

0.000

Do not share

412

17 (4.1)

Reference

 

Status of classroom floor

Cemented and clean

399

11 (2.7)

0.002 (0.000–0.015)

0.000

Not cemented

26

14 (53.8)

0.062 (0.008–0.460)

0.007

Cemented and dusty

83

72 (86.7)

Reference

 

Footwear

With shoes

77

6 (7.79)

0.081 (0.010–0.661)

0.019

Without shoes

431

91 (21.1)

Reference

 

Knowledge

(a) Probable cause of tungiasis

From soil

158

27 (17.1)

0.640 (0.072–5.713)

0.690

From Domestic animals

269

52 (19.3)

1.095 (0.153–7.854)

0.928

From infested people

81

18 (22.2)

Reference

 

(b) Treatment employed

Do not treat

14

6 (42.8)

0.142 (0.001–18.177)

0.430

Using herbs

48

7 (14.58)

0.147 (0.004–5.810)

0.307

Removing them

415

76 (18.31)

0.448 (0.023–8.781)

0.597

Removing and use of herbs

31

8 (25.8)

Reference