Skip to main content

Anopheles stephensi: a guest to watch in urban Africa


Malaria vector control programs in Sub-Saharan Africa have invested many efforts and resources in the control of eight-sibling species of Anopheles gambiae complex and An. funestus group. The behaviour of sibling species of these vectors is well known and used for implementing the current intervention tools. The reports of An. stephensi in urban Africa with different habitats breeding behaviour is an alert on the success of malaria vector control efforts achieved so far. This communication intends to give an insight on what should be considered as a challenge for the management of An. stephensi in urban Africa to retain the achievement attained in malaria control.


Malaria vectors have been managed well for the past two decades with significant progress in preventing malaria and related adverse outcomes [1]. From 2018 to 2019 the malaria mortalities have been stalled with an increase in 2020, the efforts done so far through the distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), indoor residual spray (IRS) and urban larval source management have increased the coverage [1, 2]. The gradual changes in land use, interventions and climate changes have led to species shift and re-distribution [3,4,5,6].

For a decade now in different countries of Africa there are reports of An. stephensi invasion [7,8,9]. This vector has been for long a malaria vector in south-eastern Asia [10]. The countries reported having An. stephensi are Djibouti, Ethiopia, Sudan and Somalia [9]. These reports have been confirmed after the DNA molecular analysis [11]. Anopheles stephensi is quite different from An. gambiae s.l. (Table 1). This species invasion has prompted the author to make a commentary on An. stephensi in urban Africa and its control challenges.

Table 1 Differences between An. gambiae s.l. and An. stephensi

Main text

The introduction of Anopheles stephensi in African countries from Asia has alerted the national malaria control programmes in re-designing vector control strategies. The author indicates the main factors which are expected to be challenges in the efforts to control the species. These challenges are;

  1. (i)

    An. stephensi is different from the current malaria vectors available in Africa with its breeding habitats mostly utilizing containers, holes in trees, water storage tanks and roof gutters used by Aedes aegypti species [13] (Table 1). Also, they were found to co-habit with culicine species in polluted habitats [13]. In Sri Lanka the An. stephensi has been found colonizing large water bodies breeding sites [14] which for larviciding are difficult to attend effectively. This vector possess a risk of occurrence in more countries Africa as a first case was reported in Djibouti in 2012 [15], Ethiopia in 2016 [16] and in Sudan 2019 [17]. The distribution rate of An. stephensi is very high covering a long distance Djibouti to Sudan in 6 years.

  2. (ii)

    nsecticide resistance has been reported as the main challenge for insectides used in IRS and in LLINs for other documented existing vector species [18]. In An. stephensi, the insecticides resistance has been reported in Sudan and Ethiopia [8, 19, 20]. Insecticides resistance confirmation is important for the vector control insectides based tools selection.

  3. (iii)

    The An. stephensi in Asia do feeding on human and bovines, resting indoors and outdoors [12]. Due to variations on host availability in Africa it’s not well known in which host apart from humans shall feed on. The An. stephensi resting and feeding behaviour in all reported areas has not been yet established in African countries.

  4. (iv)

    Monitoring of anthropogenic factors. Due to high rural-urban migration areas in sub–Saharan Africa, the emerging of urban agriculture, unplanned settlements, and poorly organized drainage systems effective habitats have been created [21,22,23,24]. The new species of An. stephensi is well known to be urban and peri urban malaria vector.

The way forward

  1. (i)

    To strengthen the entomological surveillance system with the ability to capture the presence of this invasive An. stephensi mosquitoes.

  2. (ii)

    To coordinate capacity building for laboratory and field entomologists in identification of An. stephensi. This is of priority to ensure sustainacy of achieved malaria vector species control and cases in two decades, 2000 to 2020.

  3. (iii)

    To establish the continuous monitoring of insecticide resistance profile of An. stephensi where the species will be reported to avoid impairing the existing tool efficacy.

  4. (iv)

    To identify the potential breeding habitats for An. stephensi in urban and peri urban for appropriate control design.

  5. (v)

    To establish the sentinel sites for continues data collection in all zones. These sentinels’ sites should operate on proposed standard operating procedures for species sampling, identification and insecticides resistance status.

    v) To emphases on the use of personal protection tools such as repellents for protection outdoors.


The NMCPs of sub-Saharan Africa have been awaken on insuring that, the attained malaria control efforts are not compromised by the new invasive species. The way forward plans should be considered for proper management and control of this new species vector.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Indoor residual spray


Long lasting insecticidal nets


National malaria control program


World health Organisation


  1. WHO. World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. In: World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. Geneva: WHO; 2020. p. 299.

    Google Scholar 

  2. WHO. World malaria report 2021. In: World malaria report 2021. Geneva: WHO; 2021. p. 299.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wanjala CL, Kweka EJ. Impact of Highland topography changes on exposure to malaria vectors and immunity in Western Kenya. Front Public Health. 2016;4:227.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Himeidan Y, Kweka E. Malaria in east African highlands during the past 30 years: impact of environmental changes. Front Physiol. 2012;3:315.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kweka EJ, Kimaro EE, Munga S. Effect of deforestation and land use changes on mosquito productivity and development in Western Kenya highlands: implication for malaria risk. Front Public Health. 2016;4:238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mwangangi JM, Mbogo CM, Orindi BO, Muturi EJ, Midega JT, Nzovu J, et al. Shifts in malaria vector species composition and transmission dynamics along the Kenyan coast over the past 20 years. Malar J. 2013;12:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinka ME, Pironon S, Massey NC, Longbottom J, Hemingway J, Moyes CL, et al. A new malaria vector in Africa: predicting the expansion range of Anopheles stephensi and identifying the urban populations at risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117(40):24900–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed A, Khogali R, Elnour M-AB, Nakao R, Salim B. Emergence of the invasive malaria vector Anopheles stephensi in Khartoum state, Central Sudan. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):511.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Balkew M, Mumba P, Dengela D, Yohannes G, Getachew D, Yared S, et al. Geographical distribution of Anopheles stephensi in eastern Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Chareonviriyaphap T, Patil AP, Temperley WH, et al. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Asia-Pacific region: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4(1):89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Balkew M, Mumba P, Yohannes G, Abiy E, Getachew D, Yared S, et al. An update on the distribution, bionomics, and insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles stephensi in Ethiopia, 2018–2020. Malar J. 2021;20:263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas S, Ravishankaran S, Justin NJA, Asokan A, Mathai MT, Valecha N, et al. Resting and feeding preferences of Anopheles stephensi in an urban setting, perennial for malaria. Malar J. 2017;16(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma S, Hamzakoya K. Geographical spread of Anopheles stephensi vector of urban malaria, and Aedes aegypti, vector of dengue/DHF, in the Arabian Sea islands of Lakshadweep, India; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gayan Dharmasiri AG, Perera AY, Harishchandra J, Herath H, Aravindan K, Jayasooriya HTR, et al. First record of Anopheles stephensi in Sri Lanka: a potential challenge for prevention of malaria reintroduction. Malar J. 2017;16(1):326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Faulde MK, Rueda LM, Khaireh BA. First record of the Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi and its possible role in the resurgence of malaria in Djibouti, horn of Africa. Acta Trop. 2014;139:39–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carter TE, Yared S, Gebresilassie A, Bonnell V, Damodaran L, Lopez K, et al. First detection of Anopheles stephensi Liston, 1901 (Diptera: culicidae) in Ethiopia using molecular and morphological approaches. Acta Trop. 2018;188:180–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. WHO. Vector alert: Anopheles stephensi invasion and spread: Horn of Africa, the Republic of the Sudan and surrounding geographical areas, and Sri Lanka: information note. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

  18. Orondo PW, Nyanjom SG, Atieli H, Githure J, Ondeto BM, Ochwedo KO, et al. Insecticide resistance status of Anopheles arabiensis in irrigated and non-irrigated areas in western Kenya. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14(1):335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Enayati A, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Sedaghat MM, Zaim M, Hemingway J. Evolution of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles stephensi in the WHO eastern Mediterranean region. Malar J. 2020;19(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yared S, Gebressielasie A, Damodaran L, Bonnell V, Lopez K, Janies D, et al. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles stephensi in Somali region, eastern Ethiopia. Malar J. 2020;19(1):1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dongus S, Nyika D, Kannady K, Mtasiwa D, Mshinda H, Gosoniu L, et al. Urban agriculture and Anopheles habitats in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Geospat Health. 2009;3(2):189–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Akono PN, Mbida JAM, Tonga C, Belong P, Ngo Hondt OE, Magne GT, et al. Impact of vegetable crop agriculture on anopheline agressivity and malaria transmission in urban and less urbanized settings of the south region of Cameroon. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8(1):293.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mathania MM, Munisi DZ, Silayo RS. Spatial and temporal distribution of Anopheles mosquito's larvae and its determinants in two urban sites in Tanzania with different malaria transmission levels. Parasit Epidemiol Control. 2020;11:e00179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Klinkenberg E, McCall PJ, Wilson MD, Amerasinghe FP, Donnelly MJ. Impact of urban agriculture on malaria vectors in Accra, Ghana. Malaria J. 2008;7(1):151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


I appreciate the help rendered by Ms. Lucy Kisima at TPRI library for provision of literature access. Dr. Bilali Kabula and Dr. Prosper Chaki are thanked for his contractive comments on first draft.


This rapid review had no financial resources, authored used available internet to search for literature.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



EJK conceived the idea and search literature, write, and reviewed to the final submission version. All author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliningaya J. Kweka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Author declare to have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kweka, E.J. Anopheles stephensi: a guest to watch in urban Africa. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines 8, 7 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: