Skip to main content

Tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine is not immunogenic when delivered by retrograde infusion into salivary glands

Abstract

Introduction and background

A tetravalent DNA vaccine for Dengue virus is under development but has not yet achieved optimal immunogenicity. Salivary glands vaccination has been reported efficacious in rodents and dogs. We report on a pilot study testing the salivary gland as a platform for a Dengue DNA vaccine in a non-human primate model.

Materials and methods

Four cynomolgus macaques were used in this study. Each macaque was pre-medicated with atropine and sedated with ketamine. Stensen’s duct papilla was cannulated with a P10 polyethylene tube, linked to a 500ul syringe. On the first two infusions, all macaques were infused with 300ul of TVDV mixed with 2 mg of zinc. For the 3rd infusion, to increase transfection into salivary tissue, two animals received 100uL TVDV mixed with 400uL polyethylenimine 1μg/ml (PEI) and the other two animals received 500uL TVDV with zinc. Antibody titers were assessed 4 weeks following the second and third infusion.

Results and conclusions

SGRI through Stensen’s duct is a well-tolerated, simple and easy to reproduce procedure. TVDV infused into macaques salivary glands elicited a significantly weaker antibody response than with different delivery methods.

Introduction and background

Dengue is a major arboviral disease that has evaded effective vaccine for over 50 years. The only currently licensed vaccine, Dengvaxia® is not suited for people who have not been infected by dengue before [1]. Traditional methods of vaccination by attenuating the virus or purifying the proteins have not been successful [2] DNA vaccines have long been known to produce good immunogenicity in different animal models [3, 4]. A tetravalent DNA vaccine for Dengue virus (TVDV) is under development but has not yet achieved optimal immunogenicity [5]. Alternative administration methods have recently shown promise in boosting the vaccine’s immunogenicity, but further increasing immunogenicity would aid in the vaccine’s development [6]. One lesser-known DNA vaccine administration site reported to result in high titer responses in rodents and dogs is the salivary gland [7,8,9]. Here, we report on a pilot study testing the feasibility and efficacy of the salivary gland as a platform for a Dengue DNA vaccine in a non-human primate model.

Materials and methods

The study involved four female cynomolgus monkeys. All were tested for dengue and other flavivirus antibody titers prior to vaccine infusions and all were negative. Twenty minutes prior to performing the procedure, each of the animals was pre-medicated with subcutaneous atropine (0.05 mg/kg) to reduce salivary secretions. Anesthesia and sedation were achieved through intramuscular delivery of ketamine/midazolam (10–15 mg/kg of ketamine and 0.01–0.05 mg/kg of midazolam). The mouth was braced open with the help of standard oral retractors, allowing for access to the sides of the oral cavity. Using standard surgical loops for magnification, the parotid papilla could be easily identified along the buccal pouch facing the second upper molar on each side. The papilla was then dilated with a conical dilator allowing cannulation with size 10 polyethylene tube (PE10) into Stensen’s duct. One end of the tubing was connected to a 500ul syringe. The tubing was gently inserted approximately 2-4 cm into the duct. To prevent back-flow of the infusate, following the duct cannulation, a small amount of cyanoacrylate was placed at the duct opening.

The DNA vaccine is composed of four plasmids, with each plasmid encoding for the pre-membrane and envelope proteins of dengue 1, 2, 3 and 4 [10]. Vaccine infusions were performed on days 0, 28, and 98. Infusions occurred at a rate of 100ul/min. The tube was left in place 5 min after infusion completion to prevent recoiling of the glands tissue with expulsion of the infusate. Food and water was restricted for 2 hours following procedure to reduce salivary secretions. The syringes were prefilled with 300ul of TVDV mixed with 2 mg of zinc. For the third infusion (day 98), in an effort to increase transfection into salivary tissue, two animals received 100ul TVDV mixed with 400ul polyethylenamine (PEI) 1μg/ml for total volume of 500ul/gland; and the other two macaques were infused with 500ul/gland TVDV solution with zinc. Serial antibody titers were obtained 4 weeks following second and third infusion as previously described [6]. Thereafter, we went on to test whether or not the procedure resulted in delivery of the infusate into the gland as planned; and whether or not transfection of the infused DNA occurred in the salivary gland cells.

To ensure our methods resulted in delivery of the infusate into the parotids, we performed fluoroscopy using contrast imaging. Additionally, to test whether or not plasmids were able to efficiently transduce cynomolgus monkey salivary gland cells, plasmid DNA encoding for Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein (EGFP) was infused. This was compared with an Adenovirus (serotype 5, Ad5) that coded for EGFP, as Ad5 is reported to efficiently transduce both acinar and ductal salivary gland cells for both rhesus macaques, as well as humans [11, 12].

Results

The procedure was well tolerated, simple and easy to reproduce. However, it resulted in poor immunological responses. Anti-Dengue Immunoglobulin G (IGG) antibody titers did not pass the threshold value of 1:20 (mean dilution) after two doses of TVDV plus zinc. Adding PEI to the infusate in two animals (NHP 1, 2), resulted in only slightly better neutralizing antibody titers for NHP 1, who had dengue serotype 2 titers going up to 1:160 (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Dengue antibody titers on day 30 by serotype in the 4 NHPs

Fig. 2
figure2

Dengue antibody titers on day 100 by serotype in the 4 NHPs. NHP 1 and NHP 2 received PEI formulated vaccine

As shown in Fig. 3, not only did the fluoroscopy confirm that the procedure resulted in the infusate filling the targeted parotid gland, the presence of EGFP was detected by immunohistochemistry in the glands infused with the Ad5 (Fig. 3a, b). However, no EGFP could be detected in the salivary glands treated with EGFP plasmid DNA (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure3

Fluoroscopy and Ad5 salivary glands infusions. Panel a: Please note adequate distribution of radiocontrast into Stensen’s duct and parotid tissue following retrograde salivary gland infusion. Panel b: note the transfection of both acinar and ductal cells by Ad5 vectored Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein detected by anti-GFP (red stain)

Fig. 4
figure4

Pathology slides at 20x magnification of parotid glands infused with plasmid vectored EGFP. Note absence of expression of EGFP (no red stain) in parotid tissue infused with plasmid vectored EGFP

Discussion

A number of new approaches are being explored to enhance immunologic responses to DNA vaccines including identifying better vectors, use of molecular adjuvants, electroporation, and delivery into tissue spaces rich in antigen presenting cells. Vaccines and vaccine candidates that elicit sub-optimal immune responses are natural test candidates for these types of approaches and technologies. For example, a recent study that assessed utilizing electroporation to administer TVDV showed encouraging results [6]. Infusion of plasmid DNA into the salivary gland has been reported to elicit a robust immune response in both rats and dogs [8, 9]. Here, we report on a pilot study testing this approach in cynomolgus macaques and find that those earlier findings could not be validated in this particular non-human primate model.

While the method of parotid gland infusion was simple and reproducible and resulted in no complications with the subject animals, infusion of the plasmid vaccine did not elicit an appreciable immune response. These findings appeared at odds with the sizable titers reported by Tucker et al. in response to DNA vaccine delivery into the salivary glands of rodents and dogs [8, 9] Given the better immunologic responses to this vaccine reported using standard techniques in this model [6] and the exploratory nature of this approach, it was important to confirm that the infusion technique was adequate to deliver the vaccine to the target tissue. We repeated the procedure under fluoroscopic imaging and demonstrated that a similar volume, fluid bolus was appropriately distributed throughout the gland, confirming the validity of the delivery technique. To determine if the delivered plasmid vector was efficiently transfected, we compared the uptake of a plasmid and an Ad5 vector coding for EGFP. EGFP was readily visualized throughout the gland following Ad5 infusion (see Fig. 3b), but no EGFP was seen in response to EGFP plasmid infusion (Fig. 4). Importantly, the Ad5 vector experiment and immunohistochemical confirmation of EGFP in the gland not only validates previous work demonstrating Ad5 transduction of salivary gland cells in rhesus macaques and humans, but extends that work into the cynomolgus model as well [13, 14].

To our knowledge, this is the first study to test DNA vaccination though the salivary gland in a non-human primate model. Prior to this, all previous studies pursuing this approach have used mice, rats or dogs, posing a natural question as to whether or not the earlier reported results can be extended into primates [15]. The results reported here collectively indicate there is exceedingly poor transfection of plasmid into salivary gland cells of the cynomolgus macaque. This was found to be the case both in the presence of zinc as well as PEI, casting doubt on this approach being translatable to humans.

If efficient gene transfer to salivary gland cells were to be achieved, this approach would seem worth revisiting. Although Ad5 appears to be an efficient vector, demonstrating tropism for both acinar and ductal cells, the evoked immune response against the vector itself would preclude repeat dosing [16]. However, one research effort has looked to ultrasound assisted gene transfer to enhance plasmid transduction, and has shown promise in both rodents and miniature pigs [17, 18]. For viral vectors to be attractive conduits, the vector should be both efficient at transducing cells and also elicit no (or only a muted) immune response. Toward this end, adeno-associated viruses have been tested, including in non-human primates, though the serotypes tested thus far do not appear capable of transducing acinar cells [19]. Lentivirus appears to transduce both acinar and ductal cells in the rodent model [20] and should be further evaluated in the primate model.

Conclusion

From a feasibility standpoint, retrograde salivary gland infusion into the parotids was simple and reproducible and could potentially be administered by a primary care provider or a dentist after appropriate training for vaccines where its efficacy would be proven.

This study was designed to build off of previous reports noting robust systemic immune responses following the delivery of plasmid DNA with zinc or lipid directly through the salivary duct. While the method is reported to work in rodents and dogs and result in a strong immune response, direct infusion of naked plasmid in the presence of zinc or PEI does not result in a notable immune response in non-human primates. Future studies should consider including augmenting technologies, such as ultrasound assisted gene transfer, or using alternative gene transfer approaches.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Sridhar S, Luedtke A, Langevin E, Zhu M, Bonaparte M, Machabert T, et al. Effect of dengue Serostatus on dengue vaccine safety and efficacy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:327–40. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thomas SJ, Endy TP. Critical issues in dengue vaccine development. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24:442–50 Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00001432-201110000-00008.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wolff JA, Ludtke JJ, Acsadi G, Williams P, Jani A. Long-term persistence of plasmid DNA and foreign gone expression in mouse muscle. Hum Mol Genet. 1992;1:363–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/1.6.363.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ulmer J, Donnelly J, Parker S, Rhodes G, Felgner P, Dwarki V, et al. Heterologous protection against influenza by injection of DNA encoding a viral protein. Science. 1993;259:1745–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8456302.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Porter KR, Teneza-Mora N, Raviprakash K. Tetravalent DNA vaccine product as a vaccine candidate against dengue; 2014. p. 283–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0410-5_17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Williams M, Ewing D, Blevins M, Sun P, Sundaram AK, Raviprakash KS, et al. Enhanced immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine using electroporation and intradermal delivery. Vaccine. 2019;37:4444–53 Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264410X19308710.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sankar V, Baccaglini L, Sawdey M, Wheeler CJ, Pillemer SR, Baum BJ, et al. Salivary gland delivery of pDNA-cationic lipoplexes elicits systemic immune responses. Oral Dis. 2002;8:275–81 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12477057.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tucker SN, Lin K, Stevens S, Scollay R, Bennett MJ, Olson DC. Salivary gland genetic vaccination: a scalable technology for promoting distal mucosal immunity and heightened systemic immune responses. Vaccine. 2004;22:2500–4 Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264410X04002622.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tucker SN, Lin K, Stevens S, Scollay R, Bennett MJ, Olson DC. Systemic and mucosal antibody responses following retroductal gene transfer to the salivary gland. Mol Ther. 2003;8:392–9 Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1525001603001801.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Danko JR, Kochel T, Teneza-Mora N, Luke TC, Raviprakash K, Sun P, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine administered with a cationic lipid-based adjuvant in a phase 1 clinical trial. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98:849–56. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0416.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    O’Connell AC, Lillibridge CD, Zheng C, Baum BJ, O’Connell BC, Ambudkar IS. γ-Irradiation-induced cell cycle arrest and cell death in a human submandibular gland cell line: Effect of E2F1 expression. J Cell Physiol. 1998;177:264–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4652%28199811%29177%3A2%3C264%3A%3AAID-JCP8%3E3.0.CO%3B2-L.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Baum BJ, Alevizos I, Zheng C, Cotrim AP, Liu S, McCullagh L, et al. Early responses to adenoviral-mediated transfer of the aquaporin-1 cDNA for radiation-induced salivary hypofunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109:19403–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210662109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    O’Connell AC, Baccaglini L, Fox PC, O’Connell BC, Kenshalo D, Oweisy H, et al. Safety and efficacy of adenovirus-mediated transfer of the human aquaporin-1 cDNA to irradiated parotid glands of non-human primates. Cancer Gene Ther. 1999;6:505–13 Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/7700078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Voutetakis A, Zheng C, Metzger M, Cotrim AP, Donahue RE, Dunbar CE, et al. Sorting of transgenic secretory proteins in rhesus macaque parotid glands after adenovirus-mediated gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther. 2008;19:1401–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2008.034.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ponzio TA, Sanders JW. The salivary gland as a target for enhancing immunization response. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines. 2017;3:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-017-0047-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Baum BJ, Alevizos I, Chiorini JA, Cotrim AP, Zheng C. Advances in salivary gland gene therapy – oral and systemic implications. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15:1443–54. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2015.1064894.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang Z, Zourelias L, Wu C, Edwards PC, Trombetta M, Passineau MJ. Ultrasound-assisted nonviral gene transfer of AQP1 to the irradiated minipig parotid gland restores fluid secretion. Gene Ther. 2015;22:739–49 Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/gt201536.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Passineau MJ, Zourelias L, Machen L, Edwards PC, Benza RL. Ultrasound-assisted non-viral gene transfer to the salivary glands. Gene Ther. 2010;17:1318–24 Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/gt201086.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Voutetakis A, Zheng C, Mineshiba F, Cotrim AP, Goldsmith CM, Schmidt M, et al. Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype 2-Mediated Gene Transfer to The Parotid Glands of Nonhuman Primates. Hum Gene Ther. 2007;18:142–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2006.154.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shai E, Falk H, Honigman A, Panet A, Palmon A. Gene transfer mediated by different viral vectors following direct cannulation of mouse submandibular salivary glands. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:254–60 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12120712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge use of the Comparative Pathology Core Laboratory supported by NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA012197) and the North Carolina Biotechnology Center Grant (2015-IDG-1006).

Funding

This project was funded internally.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GEH, JWS, TAP, and MB participated in conducting the experiments (salivary gland infusion, phlebotomy, etc.) and the writing of the manuscript. JFG participated in developing infusion technique and training others on salivary gland infusion. DLC performed the NHP necropsies and reviewed the histopathology and manuscript preparation. KSR, DE, MW and KRP provided the tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine and participated in writing the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guy El Helou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The WFSM is accredited by the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care and is compliant with the Animal Welfare Act. Animals were fed a standard commercial diet and had ad libitum access to water. The monkeys were observed on a daily basis for any abnormal clinical presentations by care staff and were tested for retroviral infections and tuberculosis prior to use. All experimental procedures outlined in this manuscript were approved by the Wake Forest Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC protocol: #A16–008). In order to minimize stress, experimental procedures were performed using anesthesia via intramuscular injections of ketamine (10–15 mg/kg). Analgesia, when necessary, was prescribed at the discretion of the laboratory animal veterinarian. The euthanasia protocol used was consistent with the Guidelines for Euthanasia of Animals from the American Veterinary Medical Association.

Consent for publication

N/A

Competing interests

N/A

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Helou, G., Ponzio, T.A., Goodman, J.F. et al. Tetravalent dengue DNA vaccine is not immunogenic when delivered by retrograde infusion into salivary glands. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines 6, 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40794-020-00111-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Salivary gland infusion
  • Tetravalent dengue vaccine
  • DNA vaccine
  • Non-human primate