The threat of antimalarial drug resistance

The previous battles and lessons learnt

Malaria was once prevalent throughout most of the inhabited world including Europe and North America [11]. The evidence for man’s attempts to fight malaria can be dated back as far as 270 years BC in the ancient Chinese medical record Nei Jing or the Canon of Internal Medicine. The bark of Cinchona trees was known as a remedy for febrile illness among Peruvian people before it was introduced to Europe by the Jesuits in the 1630s. Although Guttman and Ehrlich demonstrated the antimalarial efficacy of methylene blue in 1891 [12], the development of synthetic antimalarials did not start until after the First World War with the discovery of plasmoquine (pamaquine) in 1924. Nevertheless, quinine remained the mainstay of antimalarial treatment. In the Second World War the loss of Java and thus 90 % of the world’s Cinchona supply to Axis forces stimulated an enormous research effort which rediscovered chloroquine (first synthesised in 1934 in Germany) and led to the antifolate drugs. Together with the discovery of the insecticidal properties of DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) and its implementation in anopheline vector control, these drugs were the main weapons used in the Global Malaria Eradication campaign from 1955 to 1969. Malaria was eliminated from all Europe, most of the former USSR, North America, and many parts of South America, and Asia by the early 1970s [13]. However, misuse of antimalarial drugs, such as in the form of medicated salt [14], and widespread availability of low quality medicines [15] lead to the emergence of drug resistance. Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum appeared almost at the same time in Thailand in Southeast Asia (SEA) in 1957 [16] and in Colombia in South America in 1959 [17]. Resistance spread in both areas [18]. Chloroquine resistance spread across SE Asia and India and arrived at the eastern seaboard of Africa in 1978 [19, 20]. In 14 years it then spread across the entire continent. The cost of chloroquine resistance in human lives was enormous. The number of malaria deaths rose through the 1980s to a peak in 2004 [21]. Chloroquine resistance had spread throughout the malaria endemic world, such that the distribution of chloroquine resistance was almost identical to that of P. falciparum by 1989 [22]. Recent genetic studies analyzing microsatellite markers surrounding the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter gene (pfcrt) have confirmed that chloroquine resistance did spread from Asia to Africa [23]. Using the same technique it was shown that the main form of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance (triple 51, 59 and 108 dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) gene mutations), previously believed to originate independently from numerous sources, also spread from SEA to Africa [24].

Mixed P. falciparum and P. vivax infections are common in areas of co-endemicity such as South [25] and SE Asia [26, 27]. The mixed infections can either manifest as a double infection at the beginning of treatment or as a sequential illness known as cryptic infection [25–27]. Cryptic P. vivax is believed to be a relapse from activated hepatic hypnozoites while cryptic P. falciparum is likely from erythrocytic asexual stages not killed by P. vivax treatment [28]. Improper treatments from failure to recognise mixed infections can lead to the development and spreading of drug resistance parasites [28].

The list of other drugs that P. falciparum has developed resistance to includes quinine [13], amodiaquine [29], mefloquine, halofantrine, lumefantrine, atovaquone, cycloguanil/chlorcycloguanil, sulphonamides and sulfones [30], piperaquine [31] and recently, artemisinin and its derivatives [32, 33]. More information about molecular markers of resistance and in vitro susceptibility antimalarials can be found in a recent review by Cui and coworkers [34] and in a website of Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) at http://www.wwarn.org/tracking-resistance.

Artemisinin resistance: a terrible threat

Artemisinin (qinghaosu), a traditional Chinese medicine, is now the cornerstone of antimalarial therapeutics. It was considered so important that the 2015 Nobel Prize for Medicine or Physiology was awarded to Tu You You for her contribution to the discovery of this drug. Artemisinin and its derivatives provide the most rapid parasite clearance among known antimalarial drugs. It became a new hope as, during 1990s, resistance to available major antimalarial drugs such as chloroquine and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine worsened across malaria endemic areas globally. Artemisinin-based monotherapies has been widely used in western Cambodia for more than 30 years [33]. Combination therapy with other antimalarials of a different class was proposed to delay the development of parasite resistance to artemisinin [35, 36]. The pairing of rapidly-eliminated artemisinin derivatives and the slowly-eliminated partner drugs also shortens the course of treatment compared to those of artemisinin monotherapies [37], thus increasing adherence. Three-day artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) were introduced in the mid-1990s and shown to be highly effective and well-tolerated in treating falciparum malaria [37]. Finally since 2006, WHO has clearly recommended ACTs as the treatment of choice for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria [38]. The relatively high cost of these drugs and the reluctance of donors to support them limited their deployment initially, but substantial subsidies particularly from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) have led to a substantial increase in ACT availability in recent years. Despite the use of ACTs, delayed parasite clearance suggesting artemisinin resistance was reported in Thailand-Cambodia border in 2007 [32, 33]. The parasite clearance half-life was shown to be the best in-vivo phenotypic measure of resistance. Since then slowly clearing malaria infections, defined as having parasite clearance half-lives > 5 h, have been detected from southern Vietnam to central Myanmar [39]. This clearance has been linked with point mutations in the “propeller” region of a P. falciparum kelch protein gene on chromosome 13, also known as kelch 13 or K13 [40]. WWARN has provided an interactive map that shows the updated global prevalence of K13, The K13 Molecular Surveyor, at http://www.wwarn.org/molecular-surveyor-k13. Using the K13 marker it is now clear that artemisinin resistance has spread from the coast of Vietnam to the Eastern border of India [41, 42]. Declining artemisinin susceptibility also increases the selection pressure for the emergence of partner drug resistance due to a greater proportion of the infecting parasites remains [43]. While artemisinin resistance is associated with delayed parasite clearance or early treatment failure, long half-life partner drug resistance is associated late treatment failure [44]. Failing of partner drugs then could lead to higher clinical malaria, poor treatment outcome and increase the chance of spreading artemisinin-resistant parasites [45].

Why is it that resistance to all antimalarial drug classes seems to originate from a specific area of the world, i.e., Southeast Asia (SEA)?

Southeast Asia: the epicenter of drug resistance

In Southeast Asia, factors such as human migration particularly amongst young men who travel extensively in forested areas and forest-dwelling mosquitoes may render conventional vector-control methods less effective, resulting in a greater reliance on drugs in malaria control. Several factors in malaria endemic regions of SEA are suitable for the selection and spread of resistant parasites. Being a low transmission area, many infections are in non-immune people who become symptomatic and seek medication [30, 46]. Lower levels of immunity and higher parasite burdens increase the probability that drug resistant mutants will survive [47, 48]. Antimalarial drugs including artemisinins have been widely available in the private sector. Problems about drug use in private sector include drug quality, high frequency of wrong dosing and use of monotherapy, and inadequate knowledge and training of service providers [49, 50]. In some areas, these problems are almost similar among public and private sector [51]. Counterfeit or falsified antimalarial drugs, often now containing a small amount of artemisinins, can be found in markets and are widely used [15]. Self-medication with inadequate doses or courses of treatment or low quality medicines cause poor treatment outcomes and lead to resistance [52]. Antimalarial drug resistance usually confers a fitness disadvantage upon malaria parasites, but parasites in the SE Asian region have been exposed to several different selective forces which has created a genetic background that may predispose to the emergence of resistance [53].

The coming battle

It will be disastrous if artemisinin resistance reaches India and then Africa where most of the world’s malaria burden lies. Plans to control malaria now focus on the elimination of malaria in the greater Mekong subregion, the major source of drug-resistant parasites [54]. The methods recommended are strengthening of existing measures [54], which to date have not contained the spread of resistance nor the emergence of new foci in the region [41]. Containing resistance will become increasingly difficult as P. falciparum develops resistance to all antimalarial drug classes. Moreover, increasing numbers of international travelers [55] and improved regional transportation will facilitate spread of resistant parasites. Transmission blocking by using a single low-dose primaquine in every patient with P. falciparum infection in low transmission settings without the need for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) testing is now recommended by WHO [56]. Recent pharmacokinetic studies show that co-administration of primaquine and some ACTs, namely dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine [57] and pyronaridine –artesunate [58], are well tolerated in healthy adult subjects. No significant pharmacokinetic alterations on ACTs, but increased plasma concentrations of primaquine were observed. Although use of primaquine in radical curative regimens requires G6PD testing, the single low dose of primaquine as a P. falciparum gametocytocide has proved safe and well tolerated in G6PD deficient individuals [59]. While the antimalarial drug pipeline is healthier than ever before, none of the new drugs in development will be generally available within 4 to 5 years or, more likely, a decade. Therefore, current containment plans must rely on existing medicines. Improved dosing regimens in special populations such as pregnant women and children whose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are different from general population [60, 61] will reduce the selective pressure to resistance, and new strategies such as triple antimalarial combinations may increase the useful therapeutic life of existing drugs.

The new drugs in development range from those with known chemical structures and/or mechanism of action with enhanced properties, such as tafenoquine (an 8-aminoquinoline), artefenomel (OZ439) (a synthetic peroxide), and P218 (an antifol); to new chemical classes such as KAE609 (a spiroindolone) and KAF156 (an imidazolopiperazine) [11]. The threat of potentially untreatable falciparum malaria is real, and will require radical action if malaria is to be eliminated before the available drugs become ineffective [30, 62, 63].