Study | Number of patients | Type of study | Patient population | Study arms | Results | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hydroxychoroquine | ||||||
Gautret et al., France | 36 | Single arm trial | All positive cases | HCQ-20, No HCQ- 16 | Virological clearance on Day 6–70% in HCQ vs 12.5% in controls (p = 0.001) | [3] |
Tang et al., China | 150 | Multi-centric open labelled randomized controlled trial | All positive cases | 75- HCQ, 75- No HCQ | No difference in virological conversion rate at day28 (p = 0.341). There was no difference in improvement in clinical symptoms at day 10. | [4] |
Mahevas et al., France | 181 | Multi-centric retrospective study | All positive cases with pneumonia | 84-HCQ, 97- no HCQ | No difference in worse clinical outcomes (transfer to ICU within 7 days and/or death) between the two arms (RR- 0.93) | [5] |
Magagnoli et al., USA | 368 | Retrospective case control study | All positive veterans | HCQ- 97, HCQ + azithromycin- 113, no HCQ- 158 | Risk of death was found to be higher in those patients who received HCQ alone compared to no HCQ (p = 0.003) | [6] |
Lopinavir/ritonavir | ||||||
Cao et al., China | 199 | Randomized open labelled trial | All positive patients with respiratory illness | LPV/r- 99 No LPV/r- 100 | Did not show any decrease in time to clinical improvement, mortality or viral load after addition of LPV/r | [7] |
Remdisivir | ||||||
Grein et al., Multinational study | 53 | Multi-centric single-arm study | Patients with oxygen saturation of less than 94% | No control arm | Improvement in oxygen support class was demonstrated in 68% of the patients | [8] |
Tocilizumab | ||||||
Roumier et al., France | 30 | Case control study | Patients (< 80 years of age) with severe disease who were rapidly deteriorating | Controls matched for age and severity | Lesser ICU admission and requirement of mechanical ventilation when compared to controls (matched for age and severity) | [9] |