Skip to main content

Table 4 Differences in toileting facilities and crowding between HCV-positive and HCV-negative volunteers in Manshiet Nasser, 2003

From: A cross-sectional household cluster serosurvey of hepatitis C virus antibodies in an urban slum of Cairo, Egypt in 2004

Probable risk factors

HCVa

 

Positive, n(%)

Negative n(%)

Crude P.R.

Adjusted PR (95 % CI)b

P value

n = (180)

n = (1989)

The floor is made of earth & sand

12/179 (7)

100/1984 (5)

1.4

1.0 (0.6–1.7)

 

Traditional latrine

148/179 (83)

1384/1984 (70)

2.0

2.0 (1.4–2.9)

<0.001

Use covered pit/uncovered pit for sanitationc

63/179 (35)

537/1984 (27)

1.4

1.3 (1.0–1.9)

<0.05

More than three persons per bedroom

55/178 (31)

596/1978 (30)

1.0

1.2 (0.8–1.6)

 

No hand washing facility

36/179 (20)

326/1984 (16)

1.3

1.2 (0.8–1.6)

 
  1. aNumbers may not add up to (n) or (100 %) due to missing answers/eligibility to the question
  2. bPrevalence Ratio Adjusted for Age (95 % Confidence Interval)
  3. cCompared to municipal