Open Access

Update on non-vector transmission of dengue: relevant studies with Zika and other flaviviruses

Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines20162:15

DOI: 10.1186/s40794-016-0032-y

Received: 13 May 2016

Accepted: 13 August 2016

Published: 29 August 2016

Abstract

Human dengue virus infection without mosquito vector has been reported to occur as a result of mucocutaneous transmission, needlestick in patient care and laboratory accident, blood transfusion, bone marrow transplant, organ transplant, intrapartum and perinatal transmission, and breastfeeding. The emergence of Zika virus, another mosquito-borne flavivirus, has illustrated additional potential routes of non-vector transmission in humans. A recent study in another flavivirus, Japanese encephalitis virus, in pigs has also demonstrated non-vector transmission. We highlight some reports on dengue virus that have documented non-vector transmission and that are relevant to the transmission of Zika virus and other flaviviruses.

Keywords

Dengue Non-vector transmission Zika Flavivirus Mucocutaneous transmission

Background

Dengue virus (DENV) is a flavivirus transmitted via the bite of the female Aedes mosquitoes, usually Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Rare cases of non-vector DENV transmission have been reported in the literature involving many routes including mucocutaneous exposure, needlestick in patient care and laboratory accident, blood transfusion, bone marrow transplant, organ transplant, intrapartum and perinatal transmission, and breastfeeding [13]. Until the Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreaks in the Americas led to the recognition of non-mosquito-borne transmission, most reports on flavivirus transmission via non-vector routes have been on DENV, with rare reports on other flaviviruses. We highlight some published reports and re-examine the potential of DENV transmission without a mosquito vector.

Main text

Non-vector transmission in DENV

Among the flaviviruses, DENV and yellow fever (YF) are known to cause hemorrhagic manifestations. Because of the higher incidence and much broader distribution of DENV, and its associated thrombocytopenia and hemorrhagic manifestations, DENV potentially has the greatest associated risk for direct or nosocomial transmission. Human DENV infection without mosquito vector has been documented primarily in case reports (Table 1). Several cases of DENV transmission via mucocutaneous or needlestick exposure were identified in non-endemic countries, all in patient care and laboratory settings [1, 48]. Of note, one case occurred in a healthcare worker that sustained a blood splash to face from a patient with confirmed DENV infection [1]. Because of the proximity of blood near mucous membranes and lack of percutaneous exposure, this case was considered to be a result of mucocutaneous transmission, while oronasal or aerosol transmission could not be proven.
Table 1

Summary of published cases of DENV transmission via non-vector routes

Route of transmission

Comment

References

Mucocutaneous

A health care worker who was splashed in the face by blood from a confirmed dengue patient was documented to have dengue infection, both identified to be DENV-3.

1

Percutaneous (needle stick, laboratory injury)

Health care workers including laboratory personnel acquired DENV infection after needlestick injuries.

4–8

Blood transfusion

Transfusion-transmitted dengue has been documented in Brazil and American Red Cross/CDC Dengue Branch; a DENV-4 outbreak in Brazil resulted in transfusion transmission in about a third of recipients of RNA-positive donations.

9–11

Bone marrow transplant

Transmission of DENV-4 in a 6-year old child from Puerto Rico via bone marrow transplant led to a fatality.

12

Solid organ transplant

DENV transmission occurred from donor to recipient after living donor liver transplantation.

13

Intrapartum/perinatal

Newborns whose mothers had acute DENV infections in the peripartum period developed dengue infection, ranging from mild febrile illness with thrombocytopenia to severe manifestations.

14–26

Case reports have documented intracerebral hemorrhage and fatality in infants.

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis found increase risk for miscarriage for women with dengue during pregnancy, preterm birth, and low birthweight.

18–19

Breast milk

A woman confirmed to have DENV infection postpartum breastfed on days 2–4 of her illness. The infant developed symptoms of dengue starting on day 4 of mother’s illness, was confirmed by PCR with high viral load in blood, and breast milk was positive by PCR and culture.

3

Oronasal

No confirmed transmission reported, but the case of mucocutaneous exposure raises possibility of oronasal infection.

1

Sexual

None reported

-

DENV transmission has also occurred via blood transfusion [911], bone marrow transplant [12], and solid organ transplant [13]. Despite the concern for transmission risk from patients with bleeding diathesis, these reported cases of DENV infection from non-vector transmission were not attributed to sources with hemorrhagic manifestations.

The effect of vertical transmission of DENV on infants is highly relevant given the concern resulting from the recognition of ZIKV to cause adverse fetal outcomes including microcephaly. Many cases of intrapartum and perinatal DENV transmission have been described but none have reported congenital abnormalities [1417]. Systematic reviews to date have found an association of dengue infection during pregnancy with increased rates of preterm birth and low birth weight [18, 19]. One meta-analysis that included 6071 pregnant women, of whom 292 had DENV infection during pregnancy, found an odds ratio of 1 · 71 (95 % CI 1 · 06–2 · 76) for preterm birth and an odds ratio of 1 · 41 (95 % CI 0 · 90–2 · 21) for low birth weight in those with DENV infection. The study also identified an association with miscarriage (OR 3.51:95 % CI 1.15–10.77) [19].

Because vertical transmission of DENV usually occurred in endemic countries, confirmation faced challenges in areas where testing may not be readily available. For example, a case series from Sri Lanka of women with DENV infection during pregnancy did not document infection in most of the newborns [20]. In contrast, other cases of infants born to mothers with confirmed DENV infection just before delivery have illustrated intrapartum or perinatal transmission; the newborns typically developed febrile illnesses with thrombocytopenia [16, 18, 2126]. Some series included women with hemorrhagic manifestations in the peripartum period [16, 2123, 25]. They delivered infants who developed febrile illness confirmed to be DENV, but most infants recovered. Nevertheless, fatality has been reported in infants born to mothers with severe DENV infection [15], as well as maternal and fetal death, and miscarriage [20]. Thus, outcomes of vertical transmission of DENV in neonates ranged widely.

Most previous cases of intrapartum and perinatal transmission were presumed to be via placental transfer of virus. In 2012, a case in New Caledonia of vertical transmission occurred possibly via breastfeeding [3]. The mother had fever, anemia, and thrombocytopenia peripartum (2 days before delivery) that was later confirmed to be DENV infection [3]. The infant also developed fever and thrombocytopenia but recovered. Serial blood samples of the mother and infant and breast milk were positive for DENV by RT-PCR, but not the cord blood [3]. Viral loads in breast milk and mother’s blood on the same day were similar, and virus was cultured from breast milk, thus confirming the passage of DENV via breast milk [3]. This case report called attention to the potential role of breastfeeding in transmitting DENV, a possible mechanism in perinatal infections.

Lastly, some investigators have proposed the possibility of DENV transmission via aerosol route. This mechanism was suggested in 21 healthcare workers who were serologically confirmed to have nosocomial DENV and where there was no known needlestick or mucocutaneous exposure to DENV-infected blood [27]. To date, aerosol transmission of DENV in humans lacks confirmation.

Non-vector transmission of ZIKV

The rapid spread of ZIKV infection has brought awareness about its transmission via non-vector routes and suggest areas of study needed for DENV. The most important non-vector route appears to be sexual contact. Such transmission associated with returning travelers has been documented in several countries [2832]. In 2008, a case of probable male-to-female sexual transmission occurred in a Colorado couple where a male scientist returning from Senegal and his wife who did not travel both were confirmed to have ZIKV [33]. Another was an autochthonous case in Florence, Italy, 2014, where sexual transmission occurred between a man who returned from Thailand and his girlfriend who had not traveled [32]. More recently, male-to-male sexual transmission of ZIKV was confirmed in Texas between a traveler returning from Venezuela and his partner who had not traveled [29]. Additional cases in several countries that lack autochthonous ZIKV circulation are under investigation. [28] Importantly, semen from a Tahitian man with hematospermia tested positive for ZIKV and the virus was replicative [34]. Another report suggested the possibility of long ZIKV persistence in semen in a 68-year-old man who was diagnosed with ZIKV infection in 2014 after returning to the UK from Cook Islands; his convalescent phase semen was positive for ZIKV by real-time reverse transcription PCR at 27 and 62 days after symptoms onset [35]. Belgian investigators that followed 4 ZIKV-infected men have also reported persistence of ZIKV RNA in semen up to days 56 and 68 in two of the men [36]. Such information will contribute to the basis of recommendations for ZIKV prevention.

A notable report raised the possibility of transmission through oral (saliva) or other body fluids besides semen in a woman living in Paris who had not traveled to any area with ZIKV circulation. She had sexual contact, both vaginal and oral, several times with a man who had been in Brazil and who had symptoms of ZIKV that resolved a day before their first contact [30]. In the woman, urine and saliva were positive for ZIKV RNA; her serum PCR was negative for ZIKV RNA but IgM was positive; vaginal swab was negative for ZIKV RNA. The index patient had positive urine for ZIKV RNA but plasma and saliva were negative; his semen culture grew ZIKV on days 18 and 24 [30]. Although ZIKV has previously been identified in saliva, [37, 38] including cultivable virus [38], transmission via saliva has not been documented to date. A case of ZIKV infection following a monkey bite in Indonesia and diagnosed in Australia suggested that transmission may have occurred through saliva, but mosquito transmission could not be ruled out [39].

Other studies have also reported positive tests for ZIKV in saliva and urine with ZIKV typically persisting longer in semen, saliva, and urine than in blood [34, 38, 40]. Although transmission has not been definitively described as a result of saliva or urine, it is conceivable that infection can occur from exposure to any body fluids that have replicative ZIKV. Percutaneous exposure has resulted in ZIKV infection. Cases in laboratory setting have been documented as well as subcutaneous injection of ZIKV-containing suspension to a volunteer [41, 42]. Recently, a study on a woman infected with Zika virus has demonstrated the presence of ZIKV RNA in endocervical swab, cervical mucus, and genital swab [43]. The clinical relevance manifested in a separate case report of female to male transmission [44].

Persons infected with ZIKV but who are asymptomatic are potential sources for transfusion transmission of the virus. During the French Polynesia ZIKV outbreak, nearly 3 % of blood donations tested positive for ZIKV by PCR. Perinatal transmission of ZIKV has been identified [45]. Many studies now support the causality link between infection during pregnancy and subsequent congenital microcephaly and other developmental abnormalities [4648]. Breast milk has also tested positive for ZIKV by PCR, although culture did not yield replicative ZIKV; transmission via breast milk has not been shown to date [45, 49].

Non-vector transmission of other flaviviruses

Other flaviviruses related to DENV and ZIKV include Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), Murray Valley encephalitis, St. Louis encephalitis, West Nile virus (WNV), and yellow fever (YF). Transmission of these viruses occurs nearly always via mosquito bites, although rare human cases of non-vector transmission have occurred for JEV, WNV, and YF [50]. Studies in animals have also established viral spread via oral, intragastric, intranasal/aerosol, percutaneous, cutaneous, and mucous membrane exposure [50].

A recent article described vector-free transmission and persistence of JEV in pigs [51]. JEV is known to have a cycle involving waterbirds and Culex mosquitoes and a cycle involving pigs as amplifying hosts. However, investigation of some JE outbreaks failed to detect virus in local mosquitoes [51], which raised the question of alternative routes of transmission. By placing sentinel pigs with intravenously infected pigs, the investigators found that intravenously-infected animals developed fever after 24 h that lasted for 4–5 days; viremia persisted 3 days. Sentinel pigs in contact with infected pigs demonstrated viremia for 2–4 days. Examination of organs of injection-infected pigs found positive viral RNA in the lymph nodes, the ileum, parts of the nasal cavity, the brain, with particularly high levels in the tonsils. Shedding of virus occurred as early as 2 days after needle infection; cell cultures were positive confirming presence of live virus in oronasal swabs. Animals infected by contact shed live virus 6–10 days after contact; most oronasal swabs became positive for viral RNA about 4–7 days after infection; virus was isolated from most swabs. Histopathological CNS lesions were demonstrated for both needle-infected and contact-infected pigs. Interestingly, viral RNA was still present in the tonsils at 25 days post injection after infection but not other organs.

In summary, pigs shed JEV in oronasal secretions and can be infected via the oronasal route. Whether infected by injection, close contact, or oronasal inoculation, clinical symptoms, virus tropism, and CNS histological lesions were similar. The tonsils were prominent sites of virus replication and JEV persisted there for ≥25 days despite high levels of neutralizing antibodies.

Challenges in determining non-vector routes of transmission of DENV

Studies in animals on the transfer of DENV via aerosol or intranasal or oral route have not been done. One challenge has been the lack of adequate animal models for DENV. Non-human primates can be infected with DENV but do not become symptomatic [52]. A recently developed mouse model (AG129 mice) has contributed to some understanding of human infection with DENV [52], but there are no reports to date of AG129 mice developing DENV infection via direct contact or oronasal exposure with infected mice.

Clearly non-vector transmission of DENV has occurred, and many possible routes have been described. The overall burden of DENV infection from known non-vector transmission appears to be low. Primarily the non-vector routes involve percutaneous or mucocutaneous exposure to infectious blood, vertical transmission, and receipt of infected products for treatment. Many of these have also been reported with ZIKV in current outbreaks, and some have also been described with other flaviviruses such as WNV and YFV [50]. For instance, vaccine strain of YFV has been transmitted via breastmilk resulting in febrile illness and meningoencephalitis in the infants [5355]. Good infection control is the key to controlling DENV via non-vector transmission.

Unlike the ZIKV reports that document sexual transmission and the JEV study in pigs that confirmed oronasal transmission, DENV infection has not been attributed specifically to these routes of transmission. One case report of the blood splash to face that led to confirmed DENV infection was considered mucocutaneous transmission, but oronasal transmission might have been plausible. Possibly, oronasal and sexual routes of exposure can lead to DENV transmission, but are difficult to distinguish from mosquito-borne transmission in endemic countries where mosquito vectors are widely present.

It is also possible that routes of non-vector transmission of flaviviruses differ from each other. For DENV and ZIKV, infections in pregnant women clearly lead to different birth outcomes. While DENV in pregnant women has been associated with low birth weight infants and preterm birth, no congenital abnormality has been found, but detailed prospective studies are lacking. On the other hand, ZIKV acquired in utero has the much more severe consequence of microcephaly and multiple other abnormalities.

Current knowledge gaps with respect to DENV non-vector transmission and public health implications of possible route of transmission

Many knowledge gaps in DENV non-vector transmission remain. Key questions that need exploration in view of discoveries from ZIKV include:
  • Are there additional routes of DENV transmission, including oral, intragastric, intranasal/aerosol, and sexual routes?

  • Is DENV present in body fluids other than blood and breast milk (urine, semen, vaginal secretions, saliva, tears), and what are the virus kinetics in these body fluids?

  • If DENV is present in other body fluids, how long does it persist?

  • What is the potential of DENV transmission via sexual contact?

  • Is there any possible association of vertical transmission of DENV with congenital abnormalities?

  • Is it possible for DENV transmission via breastfeeding to cause significant harm in infants?

  • In dengue-endemic countries where mosquitos are ubiquitous, how will it be possible to determine whether a case of DENV is acquired via a mosquito bite or a non-mosquito route?

Conclusion

In conclusion, documenting and confirming non-vector routes of transmission of DENV faces challenges. Aedes mosquitoes, the vectors of disease, are ubiquitous in most countries endemic for DENV and bites occur despite preventive measures; therefore vector-borne transmission is implicated foremost as the exposure. Non-vector transmission is more likely to be suspected in non-endemic countries that detect unusual infections with some link to returning traveler or unusual exposures. Studies on DENV transmission in animal models, like the study on JEV in pigs, would be helpful in our understanding of non-vector transmission of DENV. Similar studies will also be relevant in gaining deeper understanding of the pathogenesis and transmission of ZIKV.

Abbreviations

DENV: 

Dengue virus

JEV: 

Japanese encephalitis virus

WNV: 

West Nile virus

YF: 

Yellow fever

ZIKV: 

Zika virus

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

Both authors participated in drafting and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Travel Medicine Center, Mount Auburn Hospital
(2)
Faculty of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
(3)
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
(4)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at University of California San Francisco
(5)
Division of Infectious Diseases, Mount Auburn Hospital

References

  1. Chen LH, Wilson ME. Transmission of dengue virus without a mosquito vector: nosocomial mucocutaneous transmission and other routes of transmission. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(6):e56–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen LH, Wilson ME. Nosocomial dengue by mucocutaneous transmission. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(5):775.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Barthel A, Gourinat AC, Cazorla C, Joubert C, Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, Descloux E. Breast milk as a possible route of vertical transmission of dengue virus? Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(3):415–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wagner D, de With K, Huzly D, Hufert F, Weidmann M, Breisinger S, Eppinger S, Kern WV, Bauer TM. Nosocomial acquisition of dengue. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(10):1872–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Nemes Z, Kiss G, Madarassi EP, Peterfi Z, Ferenczi E, Bakonyi T, Ternak G. Nosocomial transmission of dengue. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(10):1880–1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. de Wazières B, Gil H, Vuitton DA, Dupond JL. Nosocomial transmission of dengue from a needlestick injury. Lancet. 1998;351(9101):498.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hirsch JF, Deschamps C, Lhuillier M. [Metropolitan transmission of dengue by accidental inoculation at a hospital]. Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1990;141(7).Google Scholar
  8. Langgartner J, Audebert F, Schölmerich J, Glück T. Dengue virus infection transmitted by needle stick injury. J Infect. 2002;44(4):269–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sabino EC, Loureiro P, Lopes ME, Capuani L, McClure C, Chowdhury D, Di-Lorenzo-Oliveira C, Oliveira LC, Linnen JM, Lee TH, Gonçalez T, Brambilla D, Kleinman S, Busch MP, Custer B, International Component of the NHLBI Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-III. Transfusion-transmitted dengue and associated clinical symptoms during the 2012 epidemic in Brazil. J Infect Dis. 2016;213(5):694–702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Levi JE, Nishiya A, Félix AC, Salles NA, Sampaio LR, Hangai F, Sabino EC, Mendrone Jr A. Real-time symptomatic case of transfusion-transmitted dengue. Transfusion. 2015;55(5):961–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Matos D, Tomashek KM, Perez-Padilla J, Muñoz-Jordán J, Hunsperger E, Horiuchi K, Noyd D, Winton C, Foster G, Lanteri M, Linnen JM, Stramer SL. Probable and possible transfusion-transmitted dengue associated with NS1 antigen-negative but RNA confirmed-positive red blood cells. Transfusion. 2016;56(1):215–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rigau-Pérez JG, Vorndam AV, Clark GG. The dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever epidemic in Puerto Rico, 1994–1995. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;64(1–2):67–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Saigal S, Choudhary NS, Saraf N, Kataria S, Mohanka R, Soin AS. Transmission of dengue virus from a donor to a recipient after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2013;19(12):1413–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Thaithumyanon P, Thisyakorn U, Deerojnawong J, Innis BL. Dengue infection complicated by severe hemorrhage and vertical transmission in a parturient woman. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18(2):248–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chye JK, Lim CT, Ng KB, Lim JM, George R, Lam SK. Vertical transmission of dengue. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25(6):1374–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kerdpanich A, Watanaveeradej V, Samakoses R, Chumnanvanakij S, Chulyamitporn T, Sumeksri P, Vuthiwong C, Kounruang C, Nisalak A, Endy T. Perinatal dengue infection. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2001;32(3):488–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Boussemart T, Babe P, Sibille G, Neyret C, Berchel C. Prenatal transmission of dengue: two new cases. J Perinatol. 2001;21(4):255–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pouliot SH, Xiong X, Harville E, Paz-Soldan V, Tomashek KM, Breart G, Buekens P. Maternal dengue and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010;65(2):107–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Paixão ES, Teixeira MG, Costa MD, Rodrigues LC. Dengue during pregnancy and adverse fetal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016. doi:pii: S1473-3099(16)00088-8. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00088-8. [Epub ahead of print]
  20. Kariyawasam S, Senanayake H. Dengue infections during pregnancy: case series from a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2010;4(11):767–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Witayathawornwong P. Parturient and perinatal dengue hemorrhagic fever. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003;34(4):797–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Janjindamai W, Pruekprasert P. Perinatal dengue infection: a case report and review of literature. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003;34(4):793–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fatimil LE, Mollah AH, Ahmed S, Rahman M. Vertical transmission of dengue: first case report from Bangladesh. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003;34(4):800–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chin PS, Khoo AP, Asmah Hani AW, Chem YK, Norizah I, Chua KB. Acute dengue in a neonate secondary to perinatal transmission. Med J Malaysia. 2008;63(3):265–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ribeiro CF, Lopes VG, Brasil P, Coelho J, Muniz AG, Nogueira RM. Perinatal transmission of dengue: a report of 7 cases. J Pediatr. 2013;163(5):1514–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sinhabahu VP, Sathananthan R, Malavige GN. Perinatal transmission of dengue: a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:795.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta V, Bhoi S, Goel A, Admane S. Nosocomial dengue in health-care workers. Lancet. 2008;371(9609):299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hills SL, Russell K, Hennessey M, Williams C, Oster AM, Fischer M, Mead P. Transmission of Zika virus through sexual contact with travelers to areas of ongoing transmission - continental united states, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(8):215–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Deckard DT, Chung WM, Brooks JT, Smith JC, Woldai S, Hennessey M, Kwit N, Mead P. Male-to-male sexual transmission of Zika virus - Texas, January 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(14):372–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. D’Ortenzio E, Matheron S, de Lamballerie X, Hubert B, Piorkowski G, Maquart M, Descamps D, Damond F, Yazdanpanah Y, Leparc-Goffart I. Evidence of sexual transmission of Zika virus. N Engl J Med. 2016 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  31. Armstrong P, Hennessey M, Adams M, Cherry C, Chiu S, Harrist A, Kwit N, Lewis L, McGuire DO, Oduyebo T, Russell K, Talley P, Tanner M, Williams C, Basile J, Brandvold J, Calvert A, Cohn A, Fischer M, Goldman-Israelow B, Goodenough D, Goodman C, et al. Travel-associated Zika virus disease cases among U.S. residents - United States, January 2015-February 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(11):286–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Venturi G, Zammarchi L, Fortuna C, Remoli ME, Benedetti E, Fiorentini C, et al. An autochthonous case of Zika due to possible sexual transmission, Florence, Italy, 2014. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(8). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.8.30148.
  33. Foy BD, Kobylinski KC, Chilson Foy JL, Blitvich BJ, Travassos da Rosa A, Haddow AD, Lanciotti RS, Tesh RB. Probable non-vector-borne transmission of Zika virus, Colorado, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(5):880–2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Musso D, Roche C, Robin E, Nhan T, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau VM. Potential sexual transmission of Zika virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(2):359–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Atkinson B, Hearn P, Afrough B, Lumley S, Carter D, Aarons EJ, Simpson AJ, Brooks TJ, Hewson R. Detection of Zika virus in Semen. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(5):940.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Huits RMHG, De Smet B, Arien KK, Van Esbroeck M, de Jong BC, Bottieau E, et al. Kinetics of Zika virus persistence in semen. Bull World Health Organ. E-pub 06 Jul 2016. Available at http://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/zika_open/en/.
  37. Musso D, Roche C, Nhan TX, Robin E, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau VM. Detection of Zika virus in saliva. J Clin Virol. 2015;68:53–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Barzon L, Pacenti M, Berto A, Sinigaglia A, Franchin E, Lavezzo E, Brugnaro P, Palù G. Isolation of infectious Zika virus from saliva and prolonged viral RNA shedding in a traveller returning from the Dominican Republic to Italy, January 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(10), 10 March 2016.Google Scholar
  39. Leung GH, Baird RW, Druce J, Anstey NM. Zika virus infection in Australia following a monkey bite in Indonesia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2015;46(3):460–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gourinat AC, O’Connor O, Calvez E, Goarant C, Dupont-Rouzeyrol M. Detection of Zika virus in urine. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(1):84–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Simpson DI. Zika virus infection in man. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1964;58:335–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bearcroft WG. Zika virus infection experimentally induced in a human volunteer. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1956;50(5):442–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Prisant N. Bikam, Benichou H, Hayot P-H, Pavili L, Lurel S, Herrmann C, Janky E, Joquet G. Zika virus in the female genital tract. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; doi: 10.1016/S1473 3099(16)30193-1. Published online July 11, 2016.Google Scholar
  44. Davidson A, Slavinski S, Komoto K, Rakeman J, Weiss D. Suspected female-to-male sexual transmission of Zika virus – New York City, 2016. Morb Mort Wkly Rep 2016;65: Early Release.Google Scholar
  45. Besnard M, Lastere S, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau V, Musso D. Evidence of perinatal transmission of Zika virus, French Polynesia, December 2013 and February 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(13).Google Scholar
  46. Brasil P, Pereira JP Jr, Raja Gabaglia C, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, Ribeiro Nogueira RM, Carvalho de Sequeira P, Machado Siqueira A, Abreu de Carvalho LM, Cotrim da Cunha D, Calvet GA, Neves ES, Moreira ME, Rodrigues Baião AE, Nassar de Carvalho PR, Janzen C, Valderramos SG, Cherry JD, Bispo de Filippis AM, Nielsen-Saines K. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro -preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2016. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  47. Cauchemez S, Besnard M, Bompard P, Dub T, Guillemette-Artur P, Eyrolle-Guignot D, Salje H, Van Kerkhove MD, Abadie V, Garel C, Fontanet A, Mallet HP. Association between Zika virus and microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013–15: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2016. S0140-6736(16)00651-6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00651-6. [Epub ahead of print]
  48. Besnard M, Eyrolle-Guignot D, Guillemette-Artur P, Lastère S, Bost-Bezeaud F, Marcelis L, Abadie V, Garel C, Moutard ML, Jouannic JM, Rozenberg F, Leparc-Goffart I, Mallet HP. Congenital cerebral malformations and dysfunction in fetuses and newborns following the 2013 to 2014 Zika virus epidemic in French Polynesia. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(13), 31 March 2016.Google Scholar
  49. Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, Biron A, O’Connor O, Huguon E, Descloux E. Infectious Zika viral particles in breastmilk. Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Chen LH, Wilson ME. Non-vector transmission of dengue virus and other mosquito-borne flaviviruses. Dengue Bull. 2005;29:18–31.Google Scholar
  51. Ricklin ME, García-Nicolás O, Brechbühl D, Python S, Zumkehr B, Nougairede A, Charrel RN, Posthaus H, Oevermann A, Summerfield A. Vector-free transmission and persistence of Japanese encephalitis virus in pigs. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10832.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Zompi S, Harris E. Animal models of dengue virus infection. Viruses. 2012;4(1):62–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Traiber C, Coelho-Amaral P, Ritter VR, Winge A. Infant meningoencephalitis caused by yellow fever vaccine virus transmitted via breastmilk. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2011;87(3):269–72.Google Scholar
  54. Kuhn S, Twele-Montecinos L, MacDonald J, Webster P, Law B. Case report: probable transmission of vaccine strain of yellow fever virus to an infant via breast milk. CMAJ. 2011;183(4):E243–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Transmission of yellow fever vaccine virus through breast-feeding - Brazil, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(5):130–2.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement